[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: RDoc patches for BigDecimal in Ruby CVS

From: Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date: 2006-01-13 04:14:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #7131
More than a week and no response, so... "bump".


On 1/4/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
> Now that 1.8.4 is out and the initial flurry of problem reports has died
> down, any chance of getting my RDoc documentation for BigDecimal checked
> in by someone?  (It's attached.)
>
>
> mathew
>
>
>


In This Thread