ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#7271] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/01
[#7273] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

Hello.

[#7272] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — noreply@...

Bugs item #3399, was opened at 2006-01-31 22:25

3 messages 2006/02/01
[#7285] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3399 ] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

Hello.
[#7291] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3399 ] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — Blair Zajac <blair@...> 2006/02/02

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#7274] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/02/01
[#7275] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "ocean" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

> Hello,
[#7276] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

> Can you test attached patch? If this is OK, I'll commit this.

[#7277] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

4 messages 2006/02/01
[#7278] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

Hello.
[#7279] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/01

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#7282] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

Hello.

[#7280] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/01
[#7283] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

[#7281] Symble syntax support of RDoc parser — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello!

2 messages 2006/02/02
[#7284] Re: [patch] Symble syntax support of RDoc parser — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/02

Hi,

[#7286] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@...

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Minero Aoki wrote:

23 messages 2006/02/02
[#7289] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/02

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
[#7292] ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/02

[#7293] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/02

mathew wrote:
[#7298] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/02/03

mathew wrote:
[#7310] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
[#7311] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/07

On 2006.02.07 10:03, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7313] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

Umm, on what version are you seeing a warning there? I don't and never
[#7315] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/07

On 2006.02.07 14:47, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7316] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I'd by far prefer it never emit a warning. The warning is assumes you
[#7318] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7321] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/02/07

[#7322] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7324] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I think you've hit the point exactly, -w is only really useful at
[#7327] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7325] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2006/02/07

Hi,
[#7326] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, WATANABE Hirofumi wrote:
[#7317] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/07

On 2/7/06, Evan Webb <evanwebb@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7314] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/07

On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#7319] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/02/07

Evan Webb wrote:
[#7320] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, James Britt wrote:
[#7323] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

Having never used VB, I had no idea it had a with. Well, then thats at
[#7296] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — Christian Boos <cboos@...> 2006/02/03

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#7287] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/02/02
[#7288] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/02

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#7290] meaningful RUBY_VERSION#<=> — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

1 message 2006/02/02

[#7294] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7295] possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Socket.gethostbyname gethostbyname(3), which is surprising. It can

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7297] YAML::quick_emit api change — ara.t.howard@...

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7300] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — noreply@...

Bugs item #3438, was opened at 2006-02-03 18:41

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7301] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/04
[#7302] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/04

Hello.

[#7303] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/04

[#7304] PStore#fetch does not reture default value. — noreply@...

Bugs item #3453, was opened at 2006-02-05 12:40

1 message 2006/02/05

[#7305] Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:

28 messages 2006/02/05
[#7401] Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/22

On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7412] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/22

On Feb 21, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7414] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/23

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7427] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/26

Hi,
[#7429] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/26

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:45:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7430] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/26

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7432] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/27

In article <20060226171117.GB29508@tux-chan>,
[#7433] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/27

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:03:58PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7443] Re: [PATCH] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/28

> I've tried to fix the bug by partitioning the ID space as follows:
[#7431] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/26

[#7416] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/23

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:26:00AM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7428] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/26

In article <1140968746.321377.18843.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7444] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — nobu@... 2006/02/28

Hi,
[#7445] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <m1FDshr-0006MNC@Knoppix>,
[#7447] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <87irr047sx.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7448] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <87vev0hxu5.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7465] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — "Evan Webb" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/01

Just my quick 2 cents...
[#7468] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/01

In article <92f5f81d0602281855g27e78f4eua8bf20e0b8e47b68@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7469] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — nobu@... 2006/03/01

Hi,
[#7471] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/02

In article <m1FESAD-0001blC@Knoppix>,
[#7472] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/03/02

Sorry for interruption.
[#7474] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/02

Hi,
[#7473] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/02

Hi,
[#7475] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/03/03

[#7477] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/03

In article <5F5E76F7-CA07-403E-8015-A43FBB0741C8@zenspider.com>,
[#7466] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Kev Jackson <kevin.jackson@...> 2006/03/01

Evan Webb wrote:
[#7402] Vacation notice (was: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)) — wonado@... 2006/02/22

Liebe(r) Absender(in),

[#7306] Fwd: Is the SQLite3 gem known to have memory corruption? — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>

1 message 2006/02/05

[#7307] crash with ruby cvs head — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

2 messages 2006/02/06
[#7308] Re: crash with ruby cvs head — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/06

Hi,

[#7328] DRbObject.new(nil, nil) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

If the uri argument to DRbObject.new is nil, then the error raised is

2 messages 2006/02/08
[#7329] Re: DRbObject.new(nil, nil) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7330] Correction to string-to-float conversion of string with trailing 'e' — noreply@...

Patches item #3503, was opened at 2006-02-08 12:31

1 message 2006/02/08

[#7331] Set containing duplicates — noreply@...

Bugs item #3506, was opened at 2006-02-08 22:52

5 messages 2006/02/08
[#7332] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/08

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#7333] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#7334] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#7335] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/09

On 2006.02.09 08:44, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7336] SOAP errors for boolean types — peter anzalone <panzalone@...>

I have generated a SOAP client using wsdl2ruby.rb and have established

1 message 2006/02/09

[#7337] Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/02/11
[#7338] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/11

Hi,
[#7339] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/02/11

Am Sonntag, 12. Feb 2006, 01:34:55 +0900 schrieb Yukihiro Matsumoto:
[#7340] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/11

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7341] Re: Parse error within Regexp — dblack@... 2006/02/12

Hi --
[#7342] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/12

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:42:42AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7343] Re: Parse error within Regexp — dblack@... 2006/02/12

Hi --
[#7346] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/12

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:47:24PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7344] Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...>

Hi, all. This is my first time posting to this mailing list.

5 messages 2006/02/12
[#7345] Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2006/02/12

On Sunday 12 February 2006 15:14, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7348] Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7350] Re: Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...> 2006/02/13

[#7352] Re: Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Dae San Hwang wrote:

[#7347] Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>

It seems that the latest change to eval.c (1.616.2.154) has broken irb.

9 messages 2006/02/12
[#7349] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/13

Hi,
[#7354] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/13

Thanks, Matz.
[#7355] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
[#7356] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/13

Yep, I've just rebuilt ri database with
[#7357] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/14

Hi,
[#7358] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/14

Yeah, I should have done it in the first place. I've check out it
[#7359] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/14

Hi,
[#7360] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/14

Perfect. Thank you very much, it fixed compile problem and this one

[#7351] typo in net/ftp.rb documentation — noreply@...

Bugs item #3539, was opened at 2006-02-13 11:17

1 message 2006/02/13

[#7353] more restrictive options for test/unit/autorunner.rb ? — jonathan gold <dev@...>

is there a way, or interest in creating a way, to add switches to

1 message 2006/02/13

[#7361] Fcntl::Lock — ara.t.howard@...

1 message 2006/02/14

[#7362] undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2006/02/14
[#7363] Re: undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — dblack@... 2006/02/14

Hi --
[#7387] Re: undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2006/02/18

dblack [2006-02-15 7:38]:

[#7364] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — noreply@...

Bugs item #3565, was opened at 2006-02-15 02:32

8 messages 2006/02/15
[#7365] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,
[#7371] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/15

[#7374] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,
[#7375] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/15

On Pr 2006-02-16 at 03:18 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7380] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/17

On Pr 2006-02-16 at 04:06 +0900, Ozgur Murat Homurlu wrote:
[#7381] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/17

Sorry, resending the patch because its header is previously corrupted...
[#7388] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,

[#7366] OP_ASGN1 and OP_ASGN2 allow calling of private operators and problem with splat — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7367] Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

2 messages 2006/02/15
[#7369] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,

[#7368] Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

I resend this because my mailer set incorrect Date.

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7370] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/15
[#7372] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,

[#7373] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7376] Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2006/02/15
[#7379] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/17

Hi,
[#7382] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7384] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,
[#7389] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/18

In article <1140227235.788166.30546.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7391] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,

[#7378] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Daniel Berger wrote:

1 message 2006/02/17

[#7383] minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Ruby 1.8.4

3 messages 2006/02/17
[#7385] Re: minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,
[#7386] Re: minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/02/18

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7392] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Dominik Bathon wrote:

3 messages 2006/02/18
[#7393] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...> 2006/02/18

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:42:03 +0100, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca>
[#7394] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/18

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Dominik Bathon wrote:

[#7395] Latest change to rational.rb — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

Here's a small fix to

1 message 2006/02/20

[#7396] IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

5 messages 2006/02/20
[#7397] Re: IO#reopen — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/20

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602200406260.25048@web.artengine.ca>,
[#7398] Re: IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/20

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7399] Re: IO#reopen — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/20

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602200419080.25048@web.artengine.ca>,
[#7400] Re: IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/20

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#7403] Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>

Hi List,

12 messages 2006/02/22
[#7405] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/22

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 07:57:58PM +0900, Emiel van de Laar wrote:
[#7404] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — George Ogata <g_ogata@...> 2006/02/22

Emiel van de Laar <emiel@rednode.nl> writes:
[#7406] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — dblack@... 2006/02/22

Hi --
[#7407] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/22

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7409] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/02/22

[#7410] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/22

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7408] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/22

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7415] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — dblack@... 2006/02/23

Hi --
[#7411] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — George Ogata <g_ogata@...> 2006/02/22

dblack@wobblini.net writes:
[#7417] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/02/23

On 2/22/06, George Ogata <g_ogata@optushome.com.au> wrote:> dblack@wobblini.net writes:>> I'm still not happy about #funcall. How is one supposed to remember>> which (#send or #funcall) is which? There are a few things in Ruby>> where "you just have to memorize it" -- like the true/false arguments>> to #instance_methods, or the differences between Proc.new and lambda.>> I've always felt that these are soft spots in the language.>> #send/#funcall seems to me to be in the same category.> #funcall breaks the rules. That makes it "fun". ;-)
[#7413] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/02/22

Second! I've disliked 'funcall' since I first saw it. And why break send? I

[#7419] ping.rb — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

ping.rb has bothered me for a while for two reasons. First, it really ought

4 messages 2006/02/24
[#7425] Re: ping.rb — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/25

Pat Eyler wrote:
[#7420] Re: ping.rb — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/02/24

--- Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7421] Re: ping.rb — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/02/24

On 2/23/06, Daniel Berger <djberg96@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#7422] Syck fails with parse error on parsing multiple documents — noreply@...

Bugs item #3654, was opened at 2006-02-24 15:45

1 message 2006/02/24

[#7423] Rubygems/ri integration — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I just added a patch to Rubygems that allows it to generate ri data

3 messages 2006/02/24
[#7426] Re: [PATCH] Rubygems/ri integration — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/26

[#7479] Re: [PATCH] Rubygems/ri integration — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/03

Hi,

[#7424] Passing wrong data type to Win32API#call causes segfault — noreply@...

Bugs item #3658, was opened at 2006-02-24 19:33

1 message 2006/02/25

[#7434] parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — David Smiley <dsmiley@...>

I have encountered a counter-intuitive bug in Ruby's parser. The

5 messages 2006/02/27
[#7436] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/27

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:05:17AM +0900, David Smiley wrote:
[#7441] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — David Smiley <dsmiley@...> 2006/02/27

First of all, I'd like to apologize because my bug report was
[#7435] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/27

>>>>> "D" == David Smiley <dsmiley@mitre.org> writes:
[#7437] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2006/02/27

On Monday 27 February 2006 18:05, David Smiley wrote:

[#7438] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — "Yemi D. Bedu" <yemi@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/02/27

[#7439] FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — mathew <meta@...>

dnsbl/bl.spamcop.net returned deny: for

3 messages 2006/02/27
[#7440] Re: FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/02/27

This is fairly serious as it breaks Google Groups/Ruby Talk list
[#7464] Re: FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/03/01

On 2/27/06, Justin Bailey <jgbailey@gmail.com> wrote:> This is fairly serious as it breaks Google Groups/Ruby Talk list> integration, right?

[#7442] GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...>

I have been posting to the ruby-talk mailing list about ruby memory and GC, and I think it's ready

17 messages 2006/02/27
[#7446] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.
[#7449] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.
[#7450] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Sorry, I lied...
[#7451] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7452] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

[#7453] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7454] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

[#7455] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7462] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#7456] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

Attempting to apply patch to array.c from 1.8.4 I get:
[#7458] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7459] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

ts wrote:
[#7461] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7463] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/03/01

ts wrote:
[#7467] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/03/01

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7457] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.

[#7460] rails segfaults at 2nd load with eval.c: No such file or directory. — noreply@...

Bugs item #3683, was opened at 2006-02-28 10:33

1 message 2006/02/28

Re: possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly?

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-02-06 06:18:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #7309 
Hi,

In message "Re: possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly?"
    on Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:46:06 +0900, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> writes:

|Note that getaddrinfo(3) returns a struct hostent, and there all the
|addrs in struct hostent.h_addr_list are of the same family.
|
|I'd like to have this clarified, so I know whether to document the
|behaviour as is, or not to because its a bug that will be fixed.

It is pretty easy to apply your patch.  But I'd like to hear from
others (with socket programming experience) before fixing it.

Anyone?
							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next