[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: Newbie question

From: mac <mtscolony@...>
Date: 2006-01-06 03:09:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #7061
thanks, i will post it there.

On 1/5/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
>
> Jan 5, 2006, at 2:59 PM, mac wrote:
>
> > Hello all and happy new year.
> > I just started learning Ruby. I have good experience in Java and
> > Perl and
> > have read most of the doc on Ruby that I can get my hands on. I
> > started on a
> > project to build the DICOM netwrok library as a way to learn Ruby.
> > I have
> > done quite bit of coding on this project and have a working code.
> > Well when
> > I say quite a bit, it is about 5% done!! What I am looking for is
> > RubyIdioms
> > and if there are better ways of doing things as opposed to what I have
> > already done. Basically DICOM messages are binary and we need to
> > read the
> > data and manipulate byes. We will have to construct integers or
> > floats from
> > bytes or pair of bytes and the next few bytes could be a string
> > etc. I have
> > pasted some part of the code and want your opinion on this. Also,
> > once this
> > project has reached a point where it could be used, I will release
> > it to the
> > community.
>
> You will probably have a lot more luck with answers if you post this
> message to the Ruby Talk mailing list.  This list is mainly just used
> to discuss the internals of the Ruby interpreter.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> James Edward Gray II
>
>

In This Thread

Prev Next