From: "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Date: 2006-01-14T02:51:39+09:00
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ruby 1.8.4 RDoc HTML Cleanups and HTML Language Support


>Invalid elements are not the anywhere near the same thing as invalid
>element attributes.  This thread is a waste of time.
>
>I've reattached the patch with the xml:lang attribute removed for the
>one_page_html.rb.
>
>[snipped useless conversation]
>> Anyway, I'm not RDoc maintainer, I cannot decide intruducing new option.
>> I'll fix invalid xhtml error first based on your patch.

>Then don't apply the patch; wait until someone who is responsible for
>RDoc takes a look at it.  Don't gut it because you don't agree with
>one attribute (which is removed anyway in the attached patch).

I recomend you to check html with W3C validater. Upload html and click [validate]
link. Did you check that? And why do you want to change body's color?
Why don't you make all "CVS" to acnonym elements? And why was one font=-3
left unquoted?

First of all, I didn't intend to critisize you. I just wanted to confirm what I've
noticed and I couldn't fix before commiting. But I agree, that was really waste of time.
Please negosiate with other person about remaining issue.