[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

20 messages 2005/12/09
[#6870] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/12/12

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6872] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:

[#6873] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/12/12

On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#6874] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>

Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the

16 messages 2005/12/14

[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...

14 messages 2005/12/16

[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible

28 messages 2005/12/18

[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)

20 messages 2005/12/27

Re: bug in mailread.rb, and: proposal for Mail#to_s

From: "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
Date: 2005-12-05 11:36:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #6836
Wybo Dekker wrote:
>
> According to the mbox(5) manpage, it's the so-called "postmark line".

Ah, thanks.

> That manpage also recognizes the problem of body-lines starting wit /From /

It omits to say that a body line starting:
"From wybo@serv... Sun Sep 26 13:20:51 2004 +0200"
... is undetectable.

>
> So maybe the the expression should be less specific than proposed. Or,
> perhaps, it should be configurable.
>

The "ignore within header" part of mailread is benign because
it could never appear in a valid header.  Once the body has started,
nothing can be done.  Even valid header lines can appear in the body,
so you can't even split on a 'From ' line followed by a header with
absolute certainty.  IOW, you're fscked ;)

From wybo@serv...
From: Wybo <wybo@serv...>
To: ruby-core@ruby...


If this was "mboxread.rb", I wouldn't care what it had in it.

You've highlighted that the current mailread does have mbox "awareness"
and that's the cause of the bug.  By default, I think it should not try
to detect early EoF -- an option for mbox users would be preferable, IMO.

I've fixed my copy -- that test has been taken out :)
(I still think your version would be better than the current one.)

Cheers,

daz






In This Thread