[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

20 messages 2005/12/09
[#6870] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2005/12/12

Ara.T.Howard wrote:

[#6872] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:

[#6873] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/12/12

On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#6874] Re: ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — ara.t.howard@... 2005/12/12

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>

Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the

16 messages 2005/12/14

[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...

14 messages 2005/12/16

[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible

28 messages 2005/12/18

[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)

20 messages 2005/12/27

Re: change to yaml in 1.8.4

From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2005-12-17 05:05:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #6929

--- Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 10:42 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> > On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 09:02 +0900, Eric Hodel
> wrote:
> > >>> That's what I'm hearing - folks are building
> Gems with 1.8.4  
> > >>> preview1
> > >>> and the gem index builder thingy is failing
> when trying to YAML.load
> > >>> them.  Haven't tried it myself, though....
> > >>
> > >> I believe the gem index builder thingy will
> work with 1.8.3+ gems
> > >> once you upgrade to Ruby 1.8.3.  I have had no
> problems installing
> > >> gems built with 1.8.3 with Ruby 1.8.3.  I could
> not install 1.8.3
> > >> built gems onto 1.8.2, so 1.8.2 users would
> need to upgrade.
> > >
> > > Hm, interesting!  Any idea about installing Gems
> built with 1.8.2 on
> > > 1.8.3?
> > 
> > I have had no problems since 1.8.3+ do not need
> the '---' document  
> > separator thingy.
> 
> Cool.  Hm.  Maybe I'll upgrade RubyForge to 1.8.4p2
> and see if that
> sorts things out... thanks for the info!
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Tom

Perhaps it's time to consider XML over YAML.

Dan


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

In This Thread