[#6828] bug in mailread.rb, and: proposal for Mail#to_s — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>
mailread separates mail messages looking for /^From /.
Hi,
[#6847] Re: Proposed patch for optparse to fix multi line argument handling — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>
The attached patch fixes a bug in Optparse (at least I think it is a
Hi,
[#6864] ruby 1.8.4 rc breaks alias_method/rails in bad ways — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, [ISO-8859-15] Florian Growrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 1:42 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
On Dec 12, 2005, at 2:10 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#6888] Iconv library - differences between Ruby 1.8.2 and 1.8.4? — "Dave Burt" <dave@...>
Hi,
[#6891] Time.utc! and Time.localtime! — Daniel Hobe <hobe@...>
Writing a script yesterday I found out, much to my surprise, that the
On Dec 14, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Daniel Hobe wrote:
Hi,
[#6894] Dir.tmpdir RDoc — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Speaking of tmpdir, I'm curious why the tmpdir source
[#6906] Add Missing HTTP Headers and Status Codes to Ruby CGI — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>
Hi Everyone,
[#6911] IO.open not calling close in block form? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
What happened to the block form of IO.open after 1.8.2? It's supposed to
[#6918] change to yaml in 1.8.4 — ara.t.howard@...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Jeremy Kemper wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 03:10 +0900, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 09:02 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Tom Copeland wrote:
[#6934] 1.8.x, YAML, and release management — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm concerned that 1.8.3's acceptance of non-backwards-compatible
Hi.
Ryan Davis (ryand-ruby@zenspider.com) wrote:
On Saturday 17 December 2005 22:18, Ryan Davis wrote:
Hi.
[#6964] Array Documentation Issues — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Let's start with:
[#6979] ruby 1.8.4 preview3 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#6980] Re: ruby 1.8.4 preview3 — Kailden <kailden@...>
matz> I have just put 1.8.4 preview3 on the server.
[#6996] Problems building 1.8.4 with VS8 C++ Express Edition (cl 14.00) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Visual Studio C++ 2005 Express Edition (VS 8.0)
Hello,
On 26/12/05, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
>>> __pioinfo structure may have been changed.
Hi.
I have replaced the config/makefile setup for Ruby using C++ Express, and I
Hi,
Hello,
Hi,
On 27/12/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
Hello,
[#7008] Install fails to create directories — noreply@...
Bugs item #3115, was opened at 2005-12-28 05:00
Hi,
[#7028] Ruby 1.8.4 RDoc HTML Cleanups and HTML Language Support — Paul Duncan <pabs@...>
Hi,
Hi.
* H.Yamamoto (ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp) wrote:
* H.Yamamoto (ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp) wrote:
Re: bug in mailread.rb, and: proposal for Mail#to_s
Kev Jackson wrote: > >> I think to_s is not sufficient for string representation of whole mail >> body. It's just too long. I agreed to add a new method to do this >> work. Any name suggestion? >> >> matz. >> >> >> > sumarize/summarize! > > creates a shortened string representation of the mail If this just for the message body of an email, or is it to display headers to? If it is just for message body then why not message_body/message_body! or body/body! It isn't as short as summarize but it may more accurate to how the body of an email message is referred to. If it includes the subject line to, then I think Kev's suggestion of summarize/summarize! makes sense. Zach