[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:
Hi --
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:44:25 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 3 March 2004 at 8:00:09 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2575] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
[Resent because I accidentally signed it the first time]
[#2577] problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
Hi,
[#2582] One more proc question — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Sorry about this... :)
Hi,
On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 12:52:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2588] Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I've posted a rough first pass at a chapter about duck typing (and
[#2606] Thought about class definitions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
If we allowed
[#2628] YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
With the latest CVS, I get
[#2640] patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
[#2644] RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hi, rubyists.
[#2646] Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I have just done
On Friday, March 12, 2004, 4:15:42 AM, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2661] Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>
Hi all,
[#2697] lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 09:42:42AM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how
This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.
v3 of the patch:
Hi,
I agree that there are a lot of arguments to #start, but I think it is the
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:24:17 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:27:31 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:05:06PM +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2709] typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
[#2713] more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
> Hello,
Hi,
Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb
I agree that there are a lot of arguments to #start, but I think it is the
best way. I looked at https.rb and imap.rb and I think the way that imap.rb
implements this is the best way for pop. I felt that adding SSL this way was
the least invasive and kept the ability to do things like this:
Net::POP3.start(args...,usessl=true) { |pop|
do stuff
}
Since people can do this now (without SSL), I wanted to add the ability to
have the same code but add SSL support. I also don't think people should
have to create ssl contexts to use ssl, that should all be hidden away.
On Monday 29 March 2004 11:05 pm, Minero Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In mail "Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb"
>
> Daniel Hobe <daniel@nightrunner.com> wrote:
> > v3 of the patch:
> >
> > A few more cleanups. I've tested this against the courier POP server but
> > not with APOP.
> >
> > - # Net::POP3.start(address, port, account, password) {|pop|
> > + # Net::POP3.start(address, port, account, password,
> > + # isapop, usessl, certs, verify) {|pop|
>
> I think that #start has taken too many parameters.
> How do you think about adding POP3#use_ssl= method,
> such as Net::HTTPS? For example,
>
> pop = Net::POP.new(...)
> pop.use_ssl = true
> pop.ssl_context = ...
> pop.start {
> ....
> }
>
> This code is little longer than yours, but the intention
> is more clear.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Minero Aoki
--
Daniel Hobe <daniel@nightrunner.com>
http://www.nightrunner.com