[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

39 messages 2004/03/01
[#2531] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — ts <decoux@...> 2004/03/01

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

[#2533] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --

[#2537] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/01

Hi,

[#2542] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/02

[#2545] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,

[#2550] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how

19 messages 2004/03/27
[#2704] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/27

This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.

[#2707] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/28

v3 of the patch:

[#2721] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/30

Hi,

Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-15 08:06:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #2662
Hi,

In message "Pathological slowdown in 1.8"
    on 04/03/15, Ryan Davis <ryand@zenspider.com> writes:

|Below is the minimally reproducible test code and an unsatisfactory 
|(read: HORRID) patch that does make the behavior go away only if you 
|aren't running with -d (which seems like the correct course of 
|action--we ARE causing an error, and you'd want to know more w/ -d). 
|PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE school me on what the correct patch should be. I 
|was torn between rb_eval and name_err_mesg_to_str (which I couldn't 
|prove was the actual culprit).

I think the attached patch will fix the problem.  Thank you for
finding the problem.

							matz.

--- error.c	15 Mar 2004 02:27:29 -0000	1.93
+++ error.c	15 Mar 2004 08:05:36 -0000
@@ -348,6 +348,3 @@ exc_initialize(argc, argv, exc)
 
-    if (rb_scan_args(argc, argv, "01", &arg) == 1) {
-	VALUE mesg = arg;
-	StringValue(mesg);	/* ensure mesg can be converted to String */
-    }
+    rb_scan_args(argc, argv, "01", &arg);
     rb_iv_set(exc, "mesg", arg);

In This Thread