ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#2524] STDIN.pos — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2004/03/01
[#2525] Re: STDIN.pos — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/01

Hi,
[#2526] Re: STDIN.pos — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --

[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

39 messages 2004/03/01
[#2532] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/03/01

On Monday 01 March 2004 09:28, David A. Black wrote:
[#2530] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/01

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, David A. Black wrote:
[#2531] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — ts <decoux@...> 2004/03/01

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:
[#2533] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --
[#2534] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/01

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:23:41 +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#2535] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --
[#2536] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/01

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:00:05 +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#2537] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/01

Hi,
[#2540] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/02

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:44:25 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2546] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2552] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/03

On Wednesday, 3 March 2004 at 8:00:09 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2553] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/03

[#2556] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/03

Hi,
[#2558] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/03

[#2560] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2562] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2565] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2564] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2566] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2583] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2542] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/02

[#2543] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/02

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:38:20 +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#2554] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/03

[#2545] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2550] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2551] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/03

Hi --
[#2561] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2563] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2567] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2569] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:01:49PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2571] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2572] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:22:01PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2568] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2570] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2573] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2581] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2604] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/08

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:25:44 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2605] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/08

Hi,

[#2538] test/scanf failure — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

1 message 2004/03/02

[#2539] Loading DLL in Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...>

I have a problem:

1 message 2004/03/02

[#2541] Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2004/03/02
[#2544] Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2555] Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:49:46 +0900
[#2557] warning in test (Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/03

Hi,

[#2547] Accessing DLL from Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...>

I have a problem:

3 messages 2004/03/03
[#2548] Re: Accessing DLL from Ruby — "Bob Calco" <bobcalco@...> 2004/03/03

V.V.:
[#2549] Re: Accessing DLL from Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...> 2004/03/03

Hi Bob

[#2559] getoptlong.rb improvements — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

The exception "AmbiguousOption" is misspelled, "quit mode" should read

1 message 2004/03/03

[#2574] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

1 message 2004/03/04

[#2575] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

[Resent because I accidentally signed it the first time]

4 messages 2004/03/04
[#2576] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2579] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, March 5, 2004, 3:29:06 AM, Dave wrote:
[#2580] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/03/05

On Mar 4, 2004, at 19:49, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2577] problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/03/04
[#2578] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2589] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri 05 Mar 2004 at 09:10:06 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2591] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2593] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri 05 Mar 2004 at 19:38:42 +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2592] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/05

Hi,

[#2582] One more proc question — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Sorry about this... :)

9 messages 2004/03/05
[#2584] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2585] Re: One more proc question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 12:52:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2586] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2587] Re: One more proc question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 13:04:29 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2590] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2608] Re: One more proc question — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/09

On Friday, March 5, 2004, 3:04:29 PM, Yukihiro wrote:
[#2609] Re: One more proc question — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/09

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#2613] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2588] Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've posted a rough first pass at a chapter about duck typing (and

7 messages 2004/03/05
[#2596] Re: Duck typing chapter — "Warren Brown" <wkb@...> 2004/03/05

Dave,
[#2598] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/06

[#2619] Re: Duck typing chapter — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/10

[#2595] Re: Duck typing chapter — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2597] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/05

[#2602] Re: Duck typing chapter — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/03/06

[#2594] Net::FTP API change suggestion — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

It seems to me that some redundancy in the Net::FTP module can be

1 message 2004/03/05

[#2599] Possible strangeness in Numeric — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

To my surprise, Numeric defaults to implementing to_int by calling

4 messages 2004/03/06
[#2600] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/06

Hi,
[#2601] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/06

[#2603] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/08

Hi,

[#2606] Thought about class definitions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

If we allowed

2 messages 2004/03/09
[#2607] Re: Thought about class definitions — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2610] process.c changes — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

All,

2 messages 2004/03/09
[#2612] Re: process.c changes — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2611] process.c diff (oops) — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Here's the proper diff.

4 messages 2004/03/09
[#2625] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/10

In article <404E3A21.ED9867B7@qwest.com>,
[#2614] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,
[#2626] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/10

In article <1078871806.413261.13912.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>,

[#2615] Re: process.c diff (oops) — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

4 messages 2004/03/09
[#2616] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,
[#2617] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2004/03/10

[#2618] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,

[#2620] bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>

I found a bus error while debugging a pathological case between 1.6 and

5 messages 2004/03/10
[#2622] Re: bus error in eval.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,
[#2623] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2624] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2621] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2627] Re: Duck typing chapter — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

The second draft of the first few paragraphs is better than the first, but

2 messages 2004/03/10
[#2629] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2628] YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

With the latest CVS, I get

9 messages 2004/03/10
[#2631] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2632] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/10

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2641] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2633] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/10

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2634] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2635] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/03/11

Hello,
[#2636] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2638] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/11

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2630] Re: Duck typing chapter — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

> > Bjarne Stroustrup: http://www.artima.com/intv/abstreffi2.html

3 messages 2004/03/10
[#2637] Re: Duck typing chapter — jm <jm@...> 2004/03/11

On 11/03/2004, at 3:10 AM, Elliott Hughes wrote:
[#2639] Re: Duck typing chapter — jm <jm@...> 2004/03/11

Re-read what I posted and realised I never said what I set out to say.

[#2640] patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

6 messages 2004/03/11
[#2642] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2643] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/03/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2645] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2651] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2654] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/12

Hi,

[#2644] RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hi, rubyists.

6 messages 2004/03/11
[#2648] Re: RDoc proporsal — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2653] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Hi.
[#2655] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Sorry, it didn't work...
[#2656] Re: RDoc proporsal — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/12

On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 22:18, H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#2657] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Hi.

[#2646] Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I have just done

11 messages 2004/03/11
[#2647] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2649] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/11

On Friday, March 12, 2004, 4:15:42 AM, Dave wrote:
[#2650] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2666] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2667] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/16

[#2668] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2669] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/16

[#2670] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2658] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/12

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2652] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/12

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2659] little glitch in String#split error reporting — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

2 messages 2004/03/14
[#2660] Re: little glitch in String#split error reporting — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/14

Hi,

[#2661] Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2004/03/15
[#2662] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/15

Hi,
[#2663] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/15

[#3284] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/08/15

[#3290] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/08/19

Hi,

[#2664] DRb on Windows: the should-be-well-known problem with 'gets' — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/03/16

[#2665] Re: Ruby Vim Download Link Broken? — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/03/16

[#2671] Rename #exception — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

While I've been documenting all the to_int, to_str, methods, it

3 messages 2004/03/17
[#2672] Re: Rename #exception — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/17

Hi,
[#2673] Re: Rename #exception — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/17

[#2674] IO#fsync on fds opened as RO — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

2 messages 2004/03/18
[#2675] Re: [PATCH] IO#fsync on fds opened as RO — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/18

Hi,

[#2696] Infinite loop in st.c (st_foreach) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

1 message 2004/03/26

[#2697] lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

8 messages 2004/03/26
[#2698] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/26

Hi,
[#2705] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/28

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#2706] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/28

On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 09:42:42AM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#2710] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2729] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/31

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:20:29AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2730] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/04/01

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#2708] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — xsdg <xsdg@...> 2004/03/28

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:58:41 +0900

[#2699] Bug in pp library — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

ruby -r pp -e 'PP.singleline_pp({ 1 => 1})'

3 messages 2004/03/26
[#2701] Re: Bug in pp library — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/27

In article <A07CA5AC-7F6E-11D8-BF42-000A95676A62@pragprog.com>,
[#2702] Re: Bug in pp library — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/27

[#2700] Bug in PrettyPrint — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

This is different to the last one:

1 message 2004/03/26

[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how

19 messages 2004/03/27
[#2704] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/27

This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.
[#2707] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/28

v3 of the patch:
[#2721] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/30

Hi,
[#2722] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/30

I agree that there are a lot of arguments to #start, but I think it is the
[#2723] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/30

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:24:17 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2728] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/03/31

[#2733] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/04/01

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:27:31 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2736] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2737] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/04/02

On Thursday 01 April 2004 04:06 pm, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2738] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2004/04/02

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:14:24PM +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2739] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2744] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/04/02

I'll reimplement based on nobu's suggestion.
[#2740] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/04/02

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:05:06PM +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2741] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2742] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/04/02

(NOTE: The below is just an opinion piece, and I trust you to make a
[#2743] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/04/02

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 21:52:46 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:
[#2746] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Sergey A Yanovitsky <hermit-jah@...> 2004/04/05

Hi all.
[#2747] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/05

Hi,

[#2709] typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2004/03/28
[#2711] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2712] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/29

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 09:22:56 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2715] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,

[#2713] more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2004/03/29
[#2714] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...> 2004/03/29

> Hello,
[#2716] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2717] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/29

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 11:14:47 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2718] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2734] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/04/01

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 13:48:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2735] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/04/01

Hi,

[#2719] one more round of exception message clean-up — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/03/29

[#2720] Re: Obtaining size of Ruby objects in C — Elias Athanasopoulos <elathan@...>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Christopher C.Aycock wrote:

1 message 2004/03/29

[#2724] Issue with rb_time_new() — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Ruby 1.8.1

4 messages 2004/03/31
[#2725] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/31

Hi,
[#2726] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/31

Hi,
[#2727] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/31

Hi,

Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-11 05:39:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #2642 
Hi,

In message "patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG"
    on 04/03/11, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:

|Can anyone think of a better way to handle ENAMETOOLONG on systems that 
|have limited filename lengths?
|
|On QNX, filenames are limited to 48 bytes.

Handling ENAMETOOLONG sounds nice, but is it OK to chop off path name,
or should we just raise exception?

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next