From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-11T14:39:45+09:00
Subject: Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG

Hi,

In message "patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG"
    on 04/03/11, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:

|Can anyone think of a better way to handle ENAMETOOLONG on systems that 
|have limited filename lengths?
|
|On QNX, filenames are limited to 48 bytes.

Handling ENAMETOOLONG sounds nice, but is it OK to chop off path name,
or should we just raise exception?

							matz.