From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-05T19:35:41+09:00
Subject: Re: One more proc question

Hi,

In message "Re: One more proc question"
    on 04/03/05, Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

|> Because I want to deprecate Proc.new without attached block eventually
|> in the future.
|
|Currently I have some code that uses Proc.new. It was
|kind of a coin toss between lambda and Proc.new.
|Seems like you are saying I should change it to lambda.

Maybe, show me the code example.

|> | I.e., what about changing Proc to Block?
|> | Then, we can have 'proc' and its alias 'lambda'.
|> 
|> Maybe.  But we need to think about compatibility.
|
|I should probably say 'rename' Proc to Block.

I did understand what you meant.  We have to consider pros and cons of
the renaming.

							matz.