[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:
Hi --
Hi,
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:44:25 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 3 March 2004 at 8:00:09 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2575] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
[Resent because I accidentally signed it the first time]
[#2577] problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
Hi,
[#2582] One more proc question — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Sorry about this... :)
Hi,
On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 12:52:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
[#2588] Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
I've posted a rough first pass at a chapter about duck typing (and
[#2606] Thought about class definitions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
If we allowed
[#2628] YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
With the latest CVS, I get
[#2640] patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
[#2644] RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hi, rubyists.
[#2646] Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I have just done
On Friday, March 12, 2004, 4:15:42 AM, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2661] Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>
Hi all,
[#2697] lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 09:42:42AM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how
This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.
v3 of the patch:
Hi,
I agree that there are a lot of arguments to #start, but I think it is the
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:24:17 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:27:31 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:05:06PM +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2709] typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
[#2713] more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>
Hello,
> Hello,
Hi,
Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs...
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 5:48, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> > I've tried this again with a two new directories, one for rdoc and
> > one for cvs ruby, and I'm still getting the same failure. Rdoc's
> > install doesn't seem to install anything conditionally, so
> > everything should be renewed, shouldn't it?
> > RDoc Vgs: 2003/08/22 12:33:37 (1.72)
> > What other diags can I supply?
>
> You're using an ancient RDoc: it now comes with Ruby in Ruby's CVS
> tree. If you download and install Ruby, you'll get the latest RDoc.
OK, but I got the latest rdoc from CVS, and installed that before
doing the rdoc. I have not actually installed the cvs ruby.
ruby --version gives
ruby 1.8.1 (2003-12-25) [sparc-solaris2.9]
So why has the new rdoc not installed, and failed silently?
:r! which rdoc ; ls -l `which rdoc`
/usr/local/bin/rdoc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 156 Jan 30 17:27 /usr/local/bin/rdoc
retry:
brains# cd /scratch/hgs/rdoc/rdoc
brains# ls
CVS Makefile contrib markup web
ChangeLog NEW_FEATURES dot rdoc
EXAMPLE.rb README etc rdoc.rb
MANIFEST ToDo install.rb testcases
brains# ls -ltr | tail
-rw-r--r-- 1 hgs staff 8015 Oct 19 15:35 NEW_FEATURES
-rw-r--r-- 1 hgs staff 31508 Nov 16 15:48 ChangeLog
drwxr-xr-x 3 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 etc
drwxr-xr-x 3 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 dot
drwxr-xr-x 4 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 contrib
drwxr-xr-x 3 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 testcases
drwxr-xr-x 5 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 rdoc
drwxr-xr-x 6 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 markup
drwxr-xr-x 5 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:19 web
drwxr-xr-x 2 hgs staff 512 Mar 16 11:23 CVS
brains# ruby install.rb
brains# ls -l /usr/local/bin/rdoc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 156 Jan 30 17:27 /usr/local/bin/rdoc
brains# cat !$
cat /usr/local/bin/rdoc
#!/usr/local/bin/ruby
require 'rdoc/rdoc'
begin
r = RDoc::RDoc.new
r.document(ARGV)
rescue RDoc::RDocError => e
$stderr.puts e.message
exit(1)
end
brains#
So it should be picking up those files even if the /usr/local/bin/rdoc itself
is old.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
Hugh