Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:22:01PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block"
>     on 04/03/04, Eivind Eklund <[e-mail]> writes:
> 
> |While you're fixing this, will you also be changing so
> |  some_method() { ... }
> |is the same as
> |  some_method() { || ... }
> |?
> 
> I haven't decided yet.  Why don't you submit RCR?
> I'd like to see merit and demerit of this change.

I've submitted an RCR with a hopefully clear description, and an
analysis of pros and cons of the change (as fair as I can make it.)

There are some formatting problems with the RCR - I'm trying to get hold
of David on IRC to get to fix it somehow.

No patch included right now due to lack of time.

BTW: I've found some literature etc on the hash problem - looks like it
is clearly resolvable.  I haven't tried to prove my own direction for
this yet.

Eivind.