From: Eivind Eklund Date: 2004-03-05T00:34:53+09:00 Subject: Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:22:01PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > In message "Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block" > on 04/03/04, Eivind Eklund writes: > > |While you're fixing this, will you also be changing so > | some_method() { ... } > |is the same as > | some_method() { || ... } > |? > > I haven't decided yet. Why don't you submit RCR? > I'd like to see merit and demerit of this change. I've submitted an RCR with a hopefully clear description, and an analysis of pros and cons of the change (as fair as I can make it.) There are some formatting problems with the RCR - I'm trying to get hold of David on IRC to get to fix it somehow. No patch included right now due to lack of time. BTW: I've found some literature etc on the hash problem - looks like it is clearly resolvable. I haven't tried to prove my own direction for this yet. Eivind.