From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2004-03-10T11:07:15+09:00
Subject: Re: process.c diff (oops)

Hi,

In message "Re: process.c diff (oops)"
    on 04/03/10, "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@qwest.com> writes:

|>   * are they proper method names?
|
|I'm not sure what you mean by this.  We have wait and wait2 - why not
|wait3?  Or did you mean something else?

We can name them 'wait3/wait4' or 'wait3/waitpid3' or something more
descriptive.  I'm not sure yet which ones are the best names for the
functions.

							matz.