ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#2524] STDIN.pos — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2004/03/01
[#2525] Re: STDIN.pos — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/01

Hi,
[#2526] Re: STDIN.pos — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --

[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

39 messages 2004/03/01
[#2532] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2004/03/01

On Monday 01 March 2004 09:28, David A. Black wrote:
[#2530] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/01

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, David A. Black wrote:
[#2531] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — ts <decoux@...> 2004/03/01

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:
[#2533] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --
[#2534] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/01

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:23:41 +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#2535] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --
[#2536] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/01

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:00:05 +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#2537] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/01

Hi,
[#2540] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/02

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:44:25 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2546] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2552] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/03

On Wednesday, 3 March 2004 at 8:00:09 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2553] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/03

[#2556] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/03

Hi,
[#2558] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/03

[#2560] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2562] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2565] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2564] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2566] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2583] Re: questions... about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2542] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/02

[#2543] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/02

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 06:38:20 +0900, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#2554] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/03

[#2545] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2550] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2551] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/03

Hi --
[#2561] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2563] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2567] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2569] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:01:49PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2571] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2572] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:22:01PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2568] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2570] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/04

Hi,
[#2573] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/04

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2581] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2604] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/08

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:25:44 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2605] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/08

Hi,

[#2538] test/scanf failure — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

1 message 2004/03/02

[#2539] Loading DLL in Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...>

I have a problem:

1 message 2004/03/02

[#2541] Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2004/03/02
[#2544] Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/02

Hi,
[#2555] Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 07:49:46 +0900
[#2557] warning in test (Re: Segfault in 1.9.0 tests) — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/03

Hi,

[#2547] Accessing DLL from Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...>

I have a problem:

3 messages 2004/03/03
[#2548] Re: Accessing DLL from Ruby — "Bob Calco" <bobcalco@...> 2004/03/03

V.V.:
[#2549] Re: Accessing DLL from Ruby — "V KANETKAR" <v_kanetkar@...> 2004/03/03

Hi Bob

[#2559] getoptlong.rb improvements — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

The exception "AmbiguousOption" is misspelled, "quit mode" should read

1 message 2004/03/03

[#2574] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

1 message 2004/03/04

[#2575] Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>

[Resent because I accidentally signed it the first time]

4 messages 2004/03/04
[#2576] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/04

[#2579] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, March 5, 2004, 3:29:06 AM, Dave wrote:
[#2580] Re: Comment football being played... with lib/test/unit.rb — Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...> 2004/03/05

On Mar 4, 2004, at 19:49, Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2577] problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2004/03/04
[#2578] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2589] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri 05 Mar 2004 at 09:10:06 +0900, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2591] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2593] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri 05 Mar 2004 at 19:38:42 +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2592] Re: problem with Net::HTTP in 1.8.1 — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/05

Hi,

[#2582] One more proc question — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Sorry about this... :)

9 messages 2004/03/05
[#2584] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2585] Re: One more proc question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 12:52:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2586] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2587] Re: One more proc question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2004/03/05

On Friday, 5 March 2004 at 13:04:29 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2590] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/05

Hi,
[#2608] Re: One more proc question — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/09

On Friday, March 5, 2004, 3:04:29 PM, Yukihiro wrote:
[#2609] Re: One more proc question — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/09

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Gavin Sinclair wrote:
[#2613] Re: One more proc question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2588] Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've posted a rough first pass at a chapter about duck typing (and

7 messages 2004/03/05
[#2596] Re: Duck typing chapter — "Warren Brown" <wkb@...> 2004/03/05

Dave,
[#2598] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/06

[#2619] Re: Duck typing chapter — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/10

[#2595] Re: Duck typing chapter — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/03/05

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2597] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/05

[#2602] Re: Duck typing chapter — Chad Fowler <chad@...> 2004/03/06

[#2594] Net::FTP API change suggestion — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

It seems to me that some redundancy in the Net::FTP module can be

1 message 2004/03/05

[#2599] Possible strangeness in Numeric — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

To my surprise, Numeric defaults to implementing to_int by calling

4 messages 2004/03/06
[#2600] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/06

Hi,
[#2601] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/06

[#2603] Re: Possible strangeness in Numeric — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/08

Hi,

[#2606] Thought about class definitions — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

If we allowed

2 messages 2004/03/09
[#2607] Re: Thought about class definitions — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2610] process.c changes — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

All,

2 messages 2004/03/09
[#2612] Re: process.c changes — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/09

Hi,

[#2611] process.c diff (oops) — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Here's the proper diff.

4 messages 2004/03/09
[#2625] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/10

In article <404E3A21.ED9867B7@qwest.com>,
[#2614] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/09

Hi,
[#2626] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/10

In article <1078871806.413261.13912.nullmailer@picachu.netlab.jp>,

[#2615] Re: process.c diff (oops) — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

4 messages 2004/03/09
[#2616] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,
[#2617] Re: process.c diff (oops) — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2004/03/10

[#2618] Re: process.c diff (oops) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,

[#2620] bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>

I found a bus error while debugging a pathological case between 1.6 and

5 messages 2004/03/10
[#2622] Re: bus error in eval.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/10

Hi,
[#2623] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2624] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2621] Re: bus error in eval.c — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/10

[#2627] Re: Duck typing chapter — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

The second draft of the first few paragraphs is better than the first, but

2 messages 2004/03/10
[#2629] Re: Duck typing chapter — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2628] YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

With the latest CVS, I get

9 messages 2004/03/10
[#2631] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2632] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/10

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2641] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2633] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/10

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2634] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/10

[#2635] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2004/03/11

Hello,
[#2636] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2638] Re: YAML complaint while generating RDoc — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/11

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2630] Re: Duck typing chapter — Elliott Hughes <ehughes@...>

> > Bjarne Stroustrup: http://www.artima.com/intv/abstreffi2.html

3 messages 2004/03/10
[#2637] Re: Duck typing chapter — jm <jm@...> 2004/03/11

On 11/03/2004, at 3:10 AM, Elliott Hughes wrote:
[#2639] Re: Duck typing chapter — jm <jm@...> 2004/03/11

Re-read what I posted and realised I never said what I set out to say.

[#2640] patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

6 messages 2004/03/11
[#2642] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2643] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2004/03/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2645] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2651] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/11

Hi,
[#2654] Re: patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/12

Hi,

[#2644] RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hi, rubyists.

6 messages 2004/03/11
[#2648] Re: RDoc proporsal — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2653] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Hi.
[#2655] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Sorry, it didn't work...
[#2656] Re: RDoc proporsal — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/12

On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 22:18, H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#2657] Re: RDoc proporsal — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/03/12

Hi.

[#2646] Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

I have just done

11 messages 2004/03/11
[#2647] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2649] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/03/11

On Friday, March 12, 2004, 4:15:42 AM, Dave wrote:
[#2650] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/11

[#2666] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2667] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/16

[#2668] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2669] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/16

[#2670] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/16

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2658] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/12

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#2652] Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs... — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...> 2004/03/12

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#2659] little glitch in String#split error reporting — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

2 messages 2004/03/14
[#2660] Re: little glitch in String#split error reporting — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/14

Hi,

[#2661] Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...>

Hi all,

5 messages 2004/03/15
[#2662] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/15

Hi,
[#2663] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/03/15

[#3284] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/08/15

[#3290] Re: Pathological slowdown in 1.8 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/08/19

Hi,

[#2664] DRb on Windows: the should-be-well-known problem with 'gets' — Thomas Uehlinger <uehli@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2004/03/16

[#2665] Re: Ruby Vim Download Link Broken? — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

1 message 2004/03/16

[#2671] Rename #exception — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

While I've been documenting all the to_int, to_str, methods, it

3 messages 2004/03/17
[#2672] Re: Rename #exception — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/17

Hi,
[#2673] Re: Rename #exception — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/17

[#2674] IO#fsync on fds opened as RO — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

2 messages 2004/03/18
[#2675] Re: [PATCH] IO#fsync on fds opened as RO — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/18

Hi,

[#2696] Infinite loop in st.c (st_foreach) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

1 message 2004/03/26

[#2697] lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

8 messages 2004/03/26
[#2698] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/26

Hi,
[#2705] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/03/28

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#2706] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/28

On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 09:42:42AM +0900, why the lucky stiff wrote:
[#2710] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2729] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/31

On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:20:29AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2730] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/04/01

Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:
[#2708] Re: lib/ruby/1.9/yaml.rb:193: [BUG] Segmentation fault — xsdg <xsdg@...> 2004/03/28

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:58:41 +0900

[#2699] Bug in pp library — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

ruby -r pp -e 'PP.singleline_pp({ 1 => 1})'

3 messages 2004/03/26
[#2701] Re: Bug in pp library — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/03/27

In article <A07CA5AC-7F6E-11D8-BF42-000A95676A62@pragprog.com>,
[#2702] Re: Bug in pp library — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/03/27

[#2700] Bug in PrettyPrint — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

This is different to the last one:

1 message 2004/03/26

[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how

19 messages 2004/03/27
[#2704] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/27

This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.
[#2707] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/28

v3 of the patch:
[#2721] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/30

Hi,
[#2722] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/30

I agree that there are a lot of arguments to #start, but I think it is the
[#2723] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/03/30

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:24:17 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2728] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/03/31

[#2733] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/04/01

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:27:31 +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2736] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2737] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/04/02

On Thursday 01 April 2004 04:06 pm, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
[#2738] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Dmitry Borodaenko <d.borodaenko@...> 2004/04/02

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:14:24PM +0900, Daniel Hobe wrote:
[#2739] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2744] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/04/02

I'll reimplement based on nobu's suggestion.
[#2740] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/04/02

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:05:06PM +0900, Minero Aoki wrote:
[#2741] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/02

Hi,
[#2742] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Eivind Eklund <eivind@...> 2004/04/02

(NOTE: The below is just an opinion piece, and I trust you to make a
[#2743] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Austin Ziegler <austin@...> 2004/04/02

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004 21:52:46 +0900, Eivind Eklund wrote:
[#2746] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Sergey A Yanovitsky <hermit-jah@...> 2004/04/05

Hi all.
[#2747] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/04/05

Hi,

[#2709] typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2004/03/28
[#2711] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2712] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/29

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 09:22:56 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2715] Re: typos in lib/singleton.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,

[#2713] more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

7 messages 2004/03/29
[#2714] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...> 2004/03/29

> Hello,
[#2716] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2717] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/03/29

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 11:14:47 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2718] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/29

Hi,
[#2734] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — Ian Macdonald <ian@...> 2004/04/01

On Mon 29 Mar 2004 at 13:48:15 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#2735] Re: more spelling and grammar fixes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/04/01

Hi,

[#2719] one more round of exception message clean-up — Ian Macdonald <ian@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/03/29

[#2720] Re: Obtaining size of Ruby objects in C — Elias Athanasopoulos <elathan@...>

On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:54:34PM +0900, Christopher C.Aycock wrote:

1 message 2004/03/29

[#2724] Issue with rb_time_new() — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Ruby 1.8.1

4 messages 2004/03/31
[#2725] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/31

Hi,
[#2726] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — nobu.nokada@... 2004/03/31

Hi,
[#2727] Re: Issue with rb_time_new() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/31

Hi,

Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block

From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2004-03-03 13:26:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #2553 
On Mar 3, 2004, at 7:00, Jim Freeze wrote:
>> From Dave's writeup I was under the impression that proc and
> lambda were different in their bindings as well.
> Am I mistaken?

If I gave that impression, it was in error: 'proc' and 'lambda' are the 
same (as far as I know). If you could tell me where I led you astray, 
I'll fix it.

Matz: have you had a chance to read these pages? Are they technically 
accurate?


Cheers

Dave

In This Thread

Prev Next