From: "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>
Date: 2004-03-10T07:57:42+09:00
Subject: Re: process.c diff (oops)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:37 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: process.c diff (oops)
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In message "process.c diff (oops)"
>     on 04/03/10, Daniel Berger <djberge@qwest.com> writes:
> 
> |Here's the proper diff.
> 
> I think it's better to turn off automatic text folding before 
> posing diff to the list.

Sorry.

> 
> Questions:
> 
>   * are they proper method names?

I'm not sure what you mean by this.  We have wait and wait2 - why not
wait3?  Or did you mean something else?

>   * what platforms are they available?  linux man says wait3 and wait4
>     are defined in POSIX.1.
> 
> 							matz.

I tested on Solaris 2.9 and it looks like it's defined on 2.6 and later,
but not earlier versions.  So, I guess a 'have_func' is in order or some
configure tweaking.

Dan