[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

39 messages 2004/03/01
[#2531] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — ts <decoux@...> 2004/03/01

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

[#2533] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --

[#2537] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/01

Hi,

[#2542] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/02

[#2545] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,

[#2550] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how

19 messages 2004/03/27
[#2704] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/27

This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.

[#2707] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/28

v3 of the patch:

[#2721] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/30

Hi,

patch to tempfile.rb to handle ENAMETOOLONG

From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2004-03-11 03:28:19 UTC
List: ruby-core #2640
Can anyone think of a better way to handle ENAMETOOLONG on systems that 
have limited filename lengths?

On QNX, filenames are limited to 48 bytes.

--- /home/local/lib/ruby/1.8/tempfile.rb        2003-07-23 
09:44:54.000000000 -0700
+++ tempfile.rb 2004-03-10 19:22:22.000000000 -0800
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
         File.exist?(lock) or File.exist?(tmpname)

        Dir.mkdir(lock)
+    rescue Errno::ENAMETOOLONG
+      basename = basename[1..-1]
+      retry
      rescue
        failure += 1
        retry if failure < MAX_TRY

In This Thread

Prev Next