[#2529] concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

39 messages 2004/03/01
[#2531] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — ts <decoux@...> 2004/03/01

>>>>> "D" == David A Black <dblack@wobblini.net> writes:

[#2533] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2004/03/01

Hi --

[#2537] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/01

Hi,

[#2542] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2004/03/02

[#2545] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/03/02

Hi,

[#2550] Re: concerns about Proc,lambda,block — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/03/03

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:51:10AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2703] Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

This patch adds support to Net::POP for doing POP over SSL. Modeled on how

19 messages 2004/03/27
[#2704] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/27

This is v2 of the patch. Cleaned up a bit and added some more docs.

[#2707] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/03/28

v3 of the patch:

[#2721] Re: Proposed patch to add SSL support to net/pop.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/03/30

Hi,

Re: Problems rdoc'ing cvs...

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2004-03-16 19:58:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #2670
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dave Thomas wrote:

>
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 9:01, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> > OK, but I got the latest rdoc from CVS, and installed that before
> > doing the rdoc. I have not actually installed the cvs ruby.
>
> I'm guessing you're using the SourceForge RDoc. Use the one from the
> Ruby tree instead.

Oh, OK.  Would it be possible to modify
http://rdoc.sourceforge.net/
to this effect, or redirect the CVS link on the right or something?

Looking in the ruby/lib/rdoc directory there is no install.rb.  So
I'm building the tree completely with --prefix=/scratch/local for
now.

That took some doing. problems with zlib, but seems to have been
successful.  rdoc seems to have run successfully as part of that
build process.

Now my only rdoc problem is an inability to successfully build
graphviz.  ld crashes with signal 11, and even invoking with gcc -v
to see the full command line, and pushing that through gdb gives the
signal 11 error.  (That was how I fixed the proble with zlib (which
I had not specifically configured with --shared, so could not find
libz.so.1.2.1, because that doesn't get re-created if it doesn't
already exist and --shared causes it to exist.  All that for the
archives, just in case someone else has the same grief.)).

>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>

        Thank you,
        Hugh

In This Thread

Prev Next