[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24547] Re: Proposal: savepoints

From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Date: 2009-07-24 11:39:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #24547
I don't think that works. Among other things, lots of Rails internals use
procs, which won't marshal. You'd basically need to proxy the entire parent
environment over DRb, which is just a bit crazy (and likely impossible),
don't you think?
-- Yehuda

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu>wrote:

> Yehuda Katz wrote:
>
>> I have been thinking a lot about trying to find a way to make it easier to
>> implement code reloading in Ruby. Rails already implements code reloading
>> using remove_const, undef, etc., but it's fairly messy and can produce
>> problems. It's also a fair bit of code to implement.
>>
>
> What about splitting your code over drb?
>
> Keep persistent stuff, such as sockets, db/file handles, in the drb server,
> which stays up.
>
> Keep "user" code in the drb client, and restart for each code reload.
>
> For the development version, mock up an interface for the client that looks
> like sockets, db handles, etc., but uses drb.
>
> --
>      vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407
>
>


-- 
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325

In This Thread

Prev Next