[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24478] Re: [Bug #1801] parse error on variable/method collision

From: Caleb Clausen <caleb@...>
Date: 2009-07-21 14:40:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #24478
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> |In other words, the /a should be inside the arg list to ep(), however, it actually gets put outside.
> 
> It's intentional.  We cannot always fulfill everyone's expectation
> from various background.  When you claim "should" in your bug report,
> you have to include your rationale more than mere expectation in the
> report.

When I showed this to you at rubyconf, you confirmed that it was a bug. 
That's why I was so certain in my wording. I did include a list of the 
parse rules which would seem to apply in this case, as far as I 
understand them and how this example violates those rules.

> |Rubinius has an even more severe version of the problem. It outputs 50, which indicates that it not only misparses, it also evaluates the expression 'ep (a)' as a local variable, completely ignoring the arg list!
> 
> It seems to be a bug in Rubinius.  You should report to its maintainers.

I realize this isn't the rubinius list, I was just trying to illustrate 
how widespread this behavior is.

In This Thread