[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24503] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime.

From: Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...>
Date: 2009-07-22 13:10:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #24503
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Urabe Shyouhei<shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wro=
te:
> Kirk Haines wrote:
>> My apologies. When I was looking at that patch, I looked at trunk and
>> noted that the methods were not private in trunk, so I assumed it was
>> an OK patch. =A0I should have checked, as well, to see if it existed in
>> other 1.8.x versions.
>
> Don't mind. =A0There are days. =A0Then should we discuss whether or not t=
o port
> to_date / to_datetime into 1.8 series? =A0As I wrote before, I'm neutral.

To be specific, in order to make sure we are all talking about the
same thing, to_date and to_datetime already exist in 1.8.  They were
added in r11005.  The change was to remove the private keyword on
Time#to_date and Time#to_datetime, as shown here:

http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/branches/ruby_1_8_6/lib/date.rb=
?r1=3D21864&r2=3D24008&pathrev=3D24008&sortby=3Drev&diff_format=3Dh

The private keyword does not exist in trunk:

http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/lib/date.rb?view=3Dmarkup=
&sortby=3Drev

This change seems reasonable for the 1.8 line to me.


Kirk Haines

In This Thread