From: Michael Fellinger <m.fellinger@...>
Date: 2009-07-25T02:50:09+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:24556] Re: request: backport unique requires to 1.8.x

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Kirk Haines<wyhaines@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Yehuda Katz<wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to see all require features backported (including require_relative)
>>> and the new behavior that eliminates the possibility of the same paths
>>> described differently being treated differently.
>>
>> For the record, I'm open to this. ��It seems to be a very beneficial
>> set of functionality to backport.
>>
>
> Me too, I would love to get over the workaround of requiring Pathname
> (which do not work right now Windows) to do requires with full
> pathnames and avoid double requires.
>
> +1 for me.

A workaround is:

require File.expand_path('../relative/path/to/target', __FILE__)

>
> --
> Luis Lavena
> AREA 17
> -
> Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
> but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
> Antoine de Saint-Exup��ry
>
>

-- 
^ manveru