[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24546] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support?

From: Martin Dürst <redmine@...>
Date: 2009-07-24 10:34:01 UTC
List: ruby-core #24546
Issue #1784 has been updated by Martin D端rst.


We added BIG5-HKSCS (2004 version; same as libiconv) transcoding today. Please check. If you have any tests (see test/ruby/test_transcode, at the very end) that you can add, please contribute them.

BIG5-HKSCS wasn't available as an encoding, so we added it as a replicate of BIG5 in enc/big5.c. However, this is technically not correct. The enc/big5.c file defines 0x8? and 0x9? as single-byte
ranges, but they are used as lead bytes for double-byte characters in BIG5-HKSCS (and other BIG5 variants, it seems).

I'd estimate that this feature request is currently about 30% done. How can I set the % Done field to 30%?
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1784

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread