[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24283] Re: Problem with ruby-1.9.1-p129 (putstring opcode)

From: Mathijs Kwik <bluescreen303@...>
Date: 2009-07-12 02:36:17 UTC
List: ruby-core #24283
cool,

I tried trunk too, seems to be fixed indeed.
so it's ok for now

thanks
Mathijs

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
>> NotImplementedError: method `respond_to?' called on terminated object
>> (0x000000016e45f0)
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from (irb):2:in `puts'
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from (irb):2:in `puts'
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from (irb):2
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from /opt/ruby-1.9/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
>
>> Can anyone confirm this?
>> Is there a solution/workaround for this problem?
>
> I get this with 1.9.1p129
> not with 1.9.2 trunk though, so maybe it's a backport?
> =3Dr
>
>

In This Thread

Prev Next