[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24474] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime.

From: Marcus Rueckert <darix@...>
Date: 2009-07-21 12:09:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #24474
On 2009-07-21 18:14:59 +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
> I've just been told by another Japanese rubyist that 1.8.6 added some new
> public API.  I'm neutral to that, but honestly a bit surprised at it because
> AFAIK there was no discussion on this list about this change.  Can someone show
> me a pointer on such discussion if any?
> 
> wyhaines@ruby-lang.org wrote:
> > wyhaines	2009-07-10 03:48:23 +0900 (Fri, 10 Jul 2009)
> > 
> >   New Revision: 24008
> > 
> >   http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=24008
> > 
> >   Log:
> >     Removed private on to_date and to_datetime.
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     branches/ruby_1_8_6/ChangeLog
> >     branches/ruby_1_8_6/lib/date.rb
> >     branches/ruby_1_8_6/version.h
> 


I think he just applied my patch there. The thing is. Those methods had
been in rails i think for quite a bit. then in some 1.8.6 patch release
the methods suddenly got added as private methods in ruby core, with a
sync from upstream of date2. that broke many rails applications.

so as a package i just patched out the private statement.
so imho applying that fix upstream just fixes a breakage that got added
earlier. last but not least the methods are no longer private upstream
either.

hth

    darix

-- 
           openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
               openSUSE is good for you
                   www.opensuse.org

In This Thread