[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures
[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions
[#24120] [Bug #1717] Thread local variables not visible from within a Fiber — Muhammad Ali <redmine@...>
Bug #1717: Thread local variables not visible from within a Fiber
Hi,
[#24145] [Bug #1728] gem installed binaries don't honor program-suffix — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>
Bug #1728: gem installed binaries don't honor program-suffix
[#24152] [Bug #1732] Inconsistency in Transference of Inherited Traits ('Tainted' and 'Untrusted') with #join — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1732: Inconsistency in Transference of Inherited Traits ('Tainted' and 'Untrusted') with #join
[#24153] [Bug #1733] require does not look at current directory anymore ? — Chauk-Mean Proum <redmine@...>
Bug #1733: require does not look at current directory anymore ?
[#24188] [Bug #1740] ruby regexp 100% usage cpu. — paranormal dev <redmine@...>
Bug #1740: ruby regexp 100% usage cpu.
[#24211] [Backport #1744] Error with Marshal dump/load on a delegated class. — Guillaume Delugré <redmine@...>
Backport #1744: Error with Marshal dump/load on a delegated class.
[#24215] Performance issue with Prime class under Ruby 1.8.6 in Windows — Srdjan Pejic <spejic@...>
Hello all,
> I approached this problem a few different ways: my own solution, a Ruby
> So you're suggesting that the Prime class be optimized is that right?
[#24221] [Bug #1747] Immediate Values Can be Frozen — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1747: Immediate Values Can be Frozen
[#24229] threaded gc for the sweep phase? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Typically for me the GC spends about 50% of its time in mark phase,
[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8
[#24271] [Bug #1765] rdoc runs out of memory on Windows XP with 4GB RAM — Björn Günzel <redmine@...>
Bug #1765: rdoc runs out of memory on Windows XP with 4GB RAM
[#24307] is this expected? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
currently:
[#24311] [RCR] allow for cleaner multi-line comments — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Forgive the radicalness of this idea.
Hi,
> Comment is for comment, not to keep unused code.
[#24322] [Bug #1775] autoconf failing on cygwin — Martin Dürst <redmine@...>
Bug #1775: autoconf failing on cygwin
> On a pristine anonymous svn checkout of trunk head, I'm not able to run autoconf successfully. The error message I'm getting is as follows:
On 2009/07/14 22:23, Roger Pack wrote:
[#24326] [Bug #1777] <main>:330: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Alexandre Quintela <redmine@...>
Bug #1777: <main>:330: [BUG] Segmentation fault
[#24387] __DIR__ follow up [RCR] — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
__DIR__ would be a nice constant.
[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>
Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?
[#24395] [Bug #1785] ObjectSpace::define_finalizer on Fixnum segfaults with recent ruby — Pascal Terjan <redmine@...>
Bug #1785: ObjectSpace::define_finalizer on Fixnum segfaults with recent ruby
[#24406] [RCR] println or sprint — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Currently there is no built in utility for printing variable number of
[#24421] lvar_propagate — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Matz,
[#24425] [Bug #1786] unexpected #inspect behaviour — Andy Bogdanov <redmine@...>
Bug #1786: unexpected #inspect behaviour
[#24443] Hash[[1,2]] => {} ?? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#24451] [Bug #1793] eventmachine-0.12.8-x86-mswin32-60 BUG — Jaume Arús Sangenís <redmine@...>
Bug #1793: eventmachine-0.12.8-x86-mswin32-60 BUG
[#24455] [Backport #1795] Provide SMTP STARTTLS support — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Backport #1795: Provide SMTP STARTTLS support
[#24463] [Bug #1797] trace instruction not generated by compiler — Mark Moseley <redmine@...>
Bug #1797: trace instruction not generated by compiler
[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Urabe Shyouhei<shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wro=
Kirk Haines wrote:
[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>
Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files
Issue #1800 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#24476] [Bug #1801] parse error on variable/method collision — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #1801: parse error on variable/method collision
Hi,
[#24485] require_relative for 1.8.x possible? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Any chance of a backport for require_relative to 1.8.x?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could use the "require_all" gem, which provides 'require_rel'.
[#24488] Ruby 1.9.2: No longer possible to use send to call protected methods — Philip Ross <phil.ross@...>
With Ruby 1.9.2-preview1, it is no longer possible to use send to call
[#24502] [Bug #1805] UDPSocket#recvfrom hangs — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>
Bug #1805: UDPSocket#recvfrom hangs
[#24520] Proposal: savepoints — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
Matz,
[#24525] request: backport unique requires to 1.8.x — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Background:
I'd like to see all require features backported (including require_relative)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Yehuda Katz<wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Kirk Haines<wyhaines@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Luis Lavena<luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true
Issue #1811 has been updated by Daniel Berger.
[#24568] Proposal: match? with no backrefs — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
I was doing some work today to optimize the allocation in certain parts of
Yehuda Katz wrote:
In both of those cases, $1 is set. I'm looking for a way to check if a
[#24571] Request: add better information to website download page. — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
On Jul 27, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Luis Lavena wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, James Gray<james@grayproductions.net> wrot=
[#24580] [Bug #1822] WEBrick::HTTPServlet::AbstractServlet#do_OPTIONS raises an exception — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #1822: WEBrick::HTTPServlet::AbstractServlet#do_OPTIONS raises an exception
[#24593] [Feature #1831] Suggestion: warn on repeated character in character class — Brian Candler <redmine@...>
Feature #1831: Suggestion: warn on repeated character in character class
[#24594] [Feature #1832] irb -w — Brian Candler <redmine@...>
Feature #1832: irb -w
[#24601] [Bug #1834] 1.9.2-dev fails to compile socket with IPv6 and MinGW 3.4.5 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #1834: 1.9.2-dev fails to compile socket with IPv6 and MinGW 3.4.5
[#24621] [Bug #1843] Symbol#inspect raises exception — Brian Candler <redmine@...>
Bug #1843: Symbol#inspect raises exception
[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup
Issue #1844 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#24644] [Bug #1849] Failed to compile ruby 1.9.1-p129 with MinGW 4.4.0 — Mario Ray Mahardhika <redmine@...>
Bug #1849: Failed to compile ruby 1.9.1-p129 with MinGW 4.4.0
[ruby-core:24123] Re: [Bug #1712] Complex#% Raises NoMethodError for #floor
Hi,
In message "Re: [ruby-core:24110] [Bug #1712] Complex#% Raises NoMethodError for #floor"
on Thu, 2 Jul 2009 07:06:32 +0900, Run Paint Run Run <redmine@ruby-lang.org> writes:
|1.8's Complex had a modulus operator (%); 1.9's doesn't, and attempts to use it raise a NoMethodError for #floor because it falls back to Numeric#% which needs #floor. Is this omission intentional? If so, could an appropriate NoMethodError be raised instead? If not, I'd appreciate knowing so I can write the specifications.
I don't think there's natural definition of modulo on complex numbers,
so that we should undefine % method. We might need to do something
for compatibility's sake. Opinion?
matz.