[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24209] Clarifying `caller` Confusion: 1.8 vs. 1.9

From: Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
Date: 2009-07-08 18:35:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #24209
The output from Kernel#caller has changed between 1.8 and 1.9. This
caused many of the 1.8 tests to fail. I've modified them all to pass
but I would greatly appreciate confirmation that in doing so I haven't
legitimized any bugs.

The examples in question are at
http://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/blob/0a18bd38800eec982aab88b8bc64188da9132a16/core/kernel/caller_spec.rb
Specifically:

* 1.8 specs: http://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/blob/0a18bd38800eec982aab88b8bc64188da9132a16/core/kernel/caller_spec.rb#L46
* 1.9 specs: http://github.com/rubyspec/rubyspec/blob/0a18bd38800eec982aab88b8bc64188da9132a16/core/kernel/caller_spec.rb#L94

Do these look right? :-)

---
Run Paint Run Run

In This Thread

Prev Next