[#24105] [Bug #1711] Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1711: Marshal Failing to Round-Trip Certain Recurisve Data Structures

9 messages 2009/07/01

[#24116] [Bug #1715] Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1715: Numeric#arg for NaN is Inconsistent Across Versions

10 messages 2009/07/02

[#24240] [Bug #1755] IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8 — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1755: IO#reopen Doesn't Fully Associate with Given Stream on 1.9; Ignores pos on 1.8

8 messages 2009/07/09

[#24321] [Bug #1773] Gem path doesn't honor user gem? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Bug #1773: Gem path doesn't honor user gem?

12 messages 2009/07/14

[#24390] [Feature #1784] More encoding (Big5 series) support? — Lin Jen-Shin <redmine@...>

Feature #1784: More encoding (Big5 series) support?

12 messages 2009/07/16

[#24467] Re: [ruby-cvs:31226] Ruby:r24008 (ruby_1_8_6): Removed private on to_date and to_datetime. — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2009/07/21

[#24472] [Feature #1800] rubygems can replace system executable files — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Feature #1800: rubygems can replace system executable files

13 messages 2009/07/21

[#24530] [Feature #1811] Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #1811: Default BasicSocket.do_not_reverse_lookup to true

9 messages 2009/07/23

[#24624] [Bug #1844] Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>

Bug #1844: Immediates Should Not Respond to :dup

15 messages 2009/07/30

[ruby-core:24224] Re: Performance issue with Prime class under Ruby 1.8.6 in Windows

From: Srdjan Pejic <spejic@...>
Date: 2009-07-09 02:15:33 UTC
List: ruby-core #24224
Hi Roger,

Yeah, sorry, I was trying to say that Prime class is slow in 1.8.6. I did a
test on Ubuntu, same Ruby version down to patchlevel and the results are
similar. I've updated http://gist.github.com/142907 to include the Ubuntu
results, so that you can see it for yourself.

I'm willing to submit a patch, but I am unclear what the next steps are.

Thanks,

Srdjan

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

> > So you're suggesting that the Prime class be optimized is that right?
> > =r
>
> Oh I see what you're saying--windows 1.8.6 Prime class is slow.  Have
> you compared it with Linux?
>
> The good news is that with 1.8 on windows:
>
>      user     system      total        real
> my solution  7.891000   0.015000   7.906000 (  7.921875)
> library solution 55.094000   0.016000  55.110000 ( 55.265625)
>
> but with 1.9
>      user     system      total        real
> my solution  2.234000   0.000000   2.234000 (  2.234375)
> library solution  0.094000   0.000000   0.094000 (  0.093750)
>
> :)
>
> But test it out on Linux and make sure.
>
> If it's a windows bug then run a profiler against it, fix it, submit a
> patch [?]
>
> =r
>
>

In This Thread