[#21709] [Feature #1084] request for: Array#sort_by! — Radosław Bułat <redmine@...>
Feature #1084: request for: Array#sort_by!
Hi,
Issue #1084 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Excerpts from Henri Suur-Inkeroinen's message of Mon Feb 02 12:46:52 +0200 2009:
Eero Saynatkari wrote:
Excerpts from Kornelius Kalnbach's message of Mon Feb 02 13:32:33 +0200 2009:
Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#21714] [BUG:trunk] Got the error message, after run 'gem install --test'. — Takao Kouji <kouji@...7.net>
Hi, Ryan.
Issue #1085 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#21715] New documentation system! — Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso <grabber@...>
People,
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso
Quoting Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com>:
People,
One project that has been in the works for a while and shows a lot of
I'd love to see a documentation system similar to what python has, and
People,
Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso wrote:
=20
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:51:54AM +0900, Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso wrote:
> I like docstrings. I like being able to type "help(foo)" in python and
2009/2/14 Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com>:
> irb(main):002:0> help "String#chars"
[#21737] [Feature #1089] Stable sorting for sort and sort_by — Kornelius Kalnbach <redmine@...>
Feature #1089: Stable sorting for sort and sort_by
Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
[#21747] [Bug #1090] zlib doesn't load after installation — Jérôme Bousquié <redmine@...>
Bug #1090: zlib doesn't load after installation
[#21762] [Bug #1091] possible bad handling of return value of OCSP_basic_verify in ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #1091: possible bad handling of return value of OCSP_basic_verify in ext/openssl/ossl_ocsp.c
[#21764] ruby 1.9.1 in mingw - how to remove "-s" argument from gcc linking — Tim Elliott <tle@...>
I want to use gdb to debug an application that embeds the ruby dll.
Hi,
[#21802] [Bug #1098] Unclear encoding error: #<Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xE2\x96\x80" from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1 in conversion from CP850 to ISO-8859-1> — Tom Link <redmine@...>
Bug #1098: Unclear encoding error: #<Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xE2\x96\x80" from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1 in conversion from CP850 to ISO-8859-1>
[#21812] 1.9 Bug Report — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
When going through the RubySpecs for 1.9, I found that the following code
[#21822] [Feature #1102] Prepend Module — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #1102: Prepend Module
[#21838] What does this regexp mean - /\c#{_J}/ — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>
I am combining the escaped control character syntax (\cX) with variable int=
QWN0dWFsbHksIHdpdGggc3RyaW5ncywgdGhlIHJlZ2V4cCBpcyBldmFsdWF0ZWQgYXQgdGhlIHZl
[#21842] Regexp interpolation does not give equality — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>
Any idea why the second expression results in false? Its seems like both th=
[#21855] [Bug #1113] Compilation fails on Ubuntu 8.10, 64 bit — Jacques Lemire <redmine@...>
Bug #1113: Compilation fails on Ubuntu 8.10, 64 bit
[#21880] [Bug #1117] Array#choice always produces the same sequence — Stefano Crocco <redmine@...>
Bug #1117: Array#choice always produces the same sequence
[#21884] [Bug #1118] irb core dumps with 'CTRL-C' with zsh — Emiel van de Laar <redmine@...>
Bug #1118: irb core dumps with 'CTRL-C' with zsh
[#21886] mule-utf-8 — Roman Shterenzon <romanbsd@...>
[#21893] [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Narihiro Nakamura <redmine@...>
Feature #1122: request for: Object#try
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi--
Hi,
Hi --
Providing new syntax change for such a small thing is IMHO
Count me in as a +1 on foo.?bar(baz). I'm on the fence about whether ?bar
2009/2/15 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:
> IMHO, foo.?bar should behave as "call-except-if-nil". Not only it
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then how it is different from
Roger Pack wrote:
>>> Then how it is different from
Roger Pack wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Joel VanderWerf
Roger Pack wrote:
2009/2/19 Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu>:
[#21903] [Bug #1127] error while compiling Win32API under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #1127: error while compiling Win32API under MinGW
[#21904] 1.9 one-byte trace instruction and trap-instruction replacement? — Rocky Bernstein <rocky.bernstein@...>
Now that Ruby 1.9.1 has been released, if I recall correctly a
[#21937] [Bug #1131] String#unpack("V") does not work correctly is linux on s390x — Ittay Dror <redmine@...>
Bug #1131: String#unpack("V") does not work correctly is linux on s390x
Issue #1131 has been updated by Marcus R端ckert.
[#21944] [Bug #1134] [PATCH] Update racc runtime and fix warnings — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #1134: [PATCH] Update racc runtime and fix warnings
[#21946] New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — Brent Roman <brent@...>
At Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:30:55 +0900,
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
At Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:32:19 +0900,
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wr=
2009/2/11 Rados=B3aw Bu=B3at <radek.bulat@gmail.com>:
2009/2/11 Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@gmail.com>:
[#21958] ruby 1.9.1 parallel make race — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
Hello list,
[#21997] 1.8.7 Specifics — John Barnette <jbarnette@...>
There's a fair amount of talk lately about release management and
On Wednesday 11 of February 2009 19:42:37 John Barnette wrote:
At Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:48:51 +0900,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:42 PM, John Barnette <jbarnette@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:01:58AM +0900, Gregory Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Aaron Patterson
Gregory Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John Barnette <jbarnette@gmail.com> wrote:
Luis Lavena wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
2009/2/11 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:
Hi,
Hi,
Hello Ezra,
Let me leave a memo to remember issues I can think of.
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Excerpts from Headius: Charles Oliver Nutter's message of Sat Feb 14 00:53:17 +0200 2009:
Brent Roman wrote:
Eero Saynatkari wrote:
Excerpts from Headius: Charles Oliver Nutter's message of Sat Feb 14 20:49:52 +0200 2009:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
Hi,
Brent Roman wrote:
Brent Roman wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hongli Lai wrote:
On 11/02/2009, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
All,
On 12/02/2009, John Barnette <jbarnette@gmail.com> wrote:
[#22040] [Bug #1151] Aliased methods change super logic when retrieved with Object#method — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #1151: Aliased methods change super logic when retrieved with Object#method
[#22058] [Bug #1157] missing zlib.rb? — Fred Obermann <redmine@...>
Bug #1157: missing zlib.rb?
[#22065] Dir.glob and duplicates? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
I was fixing a JRuby Dir.glob spec failure where we produced a duplicate
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Ryan Davis wrote:
In article <4996749D.7050009@sun.com>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <49967AFC.4040006@sun.com>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <49967EC7.6080105@sun.com>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <49971135.3020009@sun.com>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#22116] [Bug #1162] Build Assertion Failure with VC+++ - Incorrect flushing of stdout/stderr — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>
Bug #1162: Build Assertion Failure with VC+++ - Incorrect flushing of stdout/stderr
[#22136] Confused about some code in mathn.rb — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
In 1.8.6 and 1.8.7, these lines appear at line 202 in mathn.rb:
[#22142] [Patch 191p0 ] for ostruct freeze behavior — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Please find attached a patch for ostruct to behave frozen for already
Robert Dober wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Joel VanderWerf
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
Do I have to file a bug report?
[#22184] [Bug #1164] 1.9/windows memroy leak with rand() AND inspect — "regis d'aubarede" <redmine@...>
Bug #1164: 1.9/windows memroy leak with rand() AND inspect
[#22206] ruby-1.9.1-p0 build failure on i586 — "Jeroen van Meeuwen (Fedora Project)" <kanarip@...>
Hi there,
> However, I get a i586 build failure:
Roger Pack wrote:
[#22246] YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
The idea is to make selectors like optional versions of Python imports.
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
2009/2/19 Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net>
Ok, based on a bunch of comments I got from Aaron Patterson and John
On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 04:34:18AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:
Excerpts from Aaron Patterson's message of Sun Feb 22 04:35:41 +0200 2009:
=20
Can you explain *why* you don't like it?
Excerpts from Yehuda Katz's message of Mon Feb 23 18:08:29 +0200 2009:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:07=A0am, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Excerpts from brixen's message of Wed Feb 25 00:04:34 +0200 2009:
2009/2/24 Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org>
On Feb 24, 3:17=A0pm, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/2/24 Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com>
I agree that this will be used in ways other than just framework creators. =
I'm also in favor of discussing this, but all I hear so far in opposition is
Florian Gilcher wrote:
On Feb 24, 9:17=A0pm, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:
Yehuda, I wonder on one thing. If you want in your framework/library
I thought I'd sent this before...hopefully it's still relevant.
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Yehuda Katz wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
2009/2/25 Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com>
On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
Jim Weirich wrote:
Jim Weirich wrote:
[#22269] [Bug #1181] [BUG] thread_free: keeping_mutexes must be NULL — Chris Schlaeger <redmine@...>
Bug #1181: [BUG] thread_free: keeping_mutexes must be NULL
[#22286] [Backport #1183] Adding support for the new hash literal syntax — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...>
Backport #1183: Adding support for the new hash literal syntax
Hi,
[#22325] suggestions for float — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>
Floating point rounding errors are common and "annoying"
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Mon Mar 02 12:46:27 +0200 2009:
Excerpts from Kurt Stephens's message of Mon Mar 02 20:27:09 +0200 2009:
>> There is public-domain C code that formats floating-point values as the
> A variant of the float to string conversion that tries to preserve all th=
Brent Roman wrote:
[#22333] [Feature #1193] Justified Error Messages — Simon Chiang <redmine@...>
Feature #1193: Justified Error Messages
[#22336] Floats are freezeable and taintable? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
In adding an optimization for Float I realized that Float objects are
Yes, that would be desirable, if there's not a good reason they aren't
At 09:19 09/02/23, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hi,
[#22347] On the consideration of macros — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...>
In a previous thread Charles Oliver Nutter had suggested the removal
[#22353] [Bug #1195] String#% does not include prefix before zero value for # versions of numeric formats — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #1195: String#% does not include prefix before zero value for # versions of numeric formats
In article <49a25ec0ce233_84c7e8c1f8909a@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
At Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:16:53 +0900,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#22365] Surprising behavior in inheritance — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Am I the only one surprised by this behavior?
Excerpts from Nikolai Weibull's message of Mon Feb 23 16:53:26 +0200 2009:
[#22383] Proposal: Integer.digit_count — Varun Gupta <thevarungupta@...>
How about having a method to return number of digits in the Integer?
[#22418] [Question]utf-8 data contains BOM - by intention or by accident? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...>
Hi!
I think this has been asked earlier, and I can only repeat it here:
Martin Duerst schrieb:
Hi,
[#22543] [Feature #1218] New method needed to set and get the current recursion limit — Conrad Taylor <redmine@...>
Feature #1218: New method needed to set and get the current recursion limit
Issue #1218 has been updated by Conrad Taylor.
[#22559] [Bug #1219] ostruct freeze still not stable — Robert Dober <redmine@...>
Bug #1219: ostruct freeze still not stable
[#22584] MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi,
In article <49a9024b.0e0d6e0a.11f5.ffffee2f@mx.google.com>,
I am having an issue with the MBARI patches. In our app the test suite has a
a back trace and ruby -v would be nice.
by back trace do you mean the output of
gdb -core core
[#22597] [Bug #1227] [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase — Chris Schlaeger <redmine@...>
Bug #1227: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase
[ruby-core:22123] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics)
Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: > 1. Which backports to 1.8.6 are you talking about in your last email? Well I'm maintaining a list of revisions that needs/experienced backport to 1.8.6 and 1.8.7. That list is on public svn and can be accessed via following URI(*), but it's hand-written so may be hard for you to read (sorry). I'm attaching "what to backport" list at the end of this mail. * http://svn.coderepos.org/share/docs/shyouhei/ruby development/revisions.txt > 2. What are your thoughts on Brent's MBARI patches? We have done some > extensive testing and these patches make a huge difference in memory > consumption and speed for production ruby applications. We are > sponsoring Brent to port these patches to 1.8.6 currently and would > really like to see these become part of mainline ruby 1.8.6, 1.8.7, > 1.8.*. These patches do not break any apis or backwards compat but > drastically improve the memory pressure of all the ruby apps we've > tested it on. We've seen ruby apps spend up to 45% of their cpu wall > time in the GC, with these patches that percentage is vastly reduced. I see no reasons to reject them for forthcoming 1.8.* versions. It seems some of them has already been merged by nobu. For 1.8.6 and 1.8.7, you should really carefully watch your step, because I see some API addition on those patches. You know why 1.8.7 is hated this much (in spite of it's being almost backward compatible). -- "what to backport" list * some of them might not be applied * maybe because they turned out not to be a bug * maybe because appling them breaks tests * some other revs might be added in the future revisions | what it is ------------+------------------------------------------------------- 20252:20255 | [ruby-dev:37110] 20276:20279 | [ruby-dev:37119] 20287 | [ruby-core:19971] 20300 | nagai tk patch (applies?) 20350 | nagai tk patch (applies?) 20354 | [ruby-core:20082] 20360:20363 | [ruby-dev:37182] 20445 | [ruby-core:12020] 20525 | matz infection patch 20537 | usa fork patch 20540 | usa isatty patch 20578 | [ ruby-Bugs-22525 ] 20580 | [ruby-dev:37283] 20581 | [ruby-dev:37289] 20752 | [ruby-core:20561] 20855 | [ruby-core:20603] [ruby-core:20604] 20884 | [ruby-core:18635] 21066 | [ruby-dev:36692] 21165 | [ruby-core:20446] 21297 | [ruby-core:21096] 21298 | [ruby-dev:37691] <- suspicious spec change? 21353 | [ruby-core:13889] 21365 | [ruby-core:17333] 21407 | [ruby-dev:25712] [ruby-dev:25700] [ruby-dev:25707] 21423 | [ruby-core:21249] 21432 | [ruby-dev:37751] 21447 | [ruby-core:21269] <- Windows bug? 21505 | [ruby-core:21328] 21677 | [ruby-dev:37776] 21688 | [ruby-core:21453] 21726 | [ruby-dev:36646] 21727 | [ruby-core:21500] 21749 | [ruby-core:21448] 21913 | [ruby-core:21561] 21994 | [ruby-core:20113] 21997 | [ruby-core:18749] 22011 | [ruby-dev:37545]