From: Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...>
Date: 2009-02-26T11:24:32+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:22528] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace  Proposal)


On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:16 PM, Gary Wright wrote:

> In my understanding of the namespace proposal, the same overall  
> algorithm applies except that the exact sequence of modules/classes  
> is modified according to the modules 'inserted' via the 'using'  
> keyword.  If namespaces can be 'nested' so that multiple namespace  
> modules are in the lookup sequence then shouldn't 'super' behave as  
> normal and just resume the lookup process including any unsearched  
> namespaces?

Which namespaces?  The ones in scope at the original call site, or the  
ones in scope at the super invocation?

I think the former would be rather problematic.  The later is probably  
what you want.  Especially given the static/lexical nature of selector  
namespaces.

-- 
-- Jim Weirich
-- jim.weirich@gmail.com