[#22684] [Bug #1247] YAML::load converts some dates into strings — Matthew Wilson <redmine@...>

Bug #1247: YAML::load converts some dates into strings

10 messages 2009/03/05

[#22725] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1253: Fix MSVC Build Issues

13 messages 2009/03/07

[#22727] Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

Hi everyone,

14 messages 2009/03/08

[#22731] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Lee <redmine@...>

Bug #1255: += for large strings egrigiously slow

11 messages 2009/03/08

[#22736] Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...>

Moin, moin!

13 messages 2009/03/08
[#22739] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/08

Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner schrieb:

[#22748] [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <redmine@...>

Feature #1256: Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented

7 messages 2009/03/08

[#22803] Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello and sorry for my being slow for this issue. It's OK now for me to pass

21 messages 2009/03/10

[#22812] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...>

Bug #1261: cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR

8 messages 2009/03/10

[#22892] Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...>

Got tired of current ruby Time limitation, I have written this -

24 messages 2009/03/14
[#22949] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/19

In article <9e19ed87-9d12-4f98-af3c-bd49a71b0bd4@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

[#22974] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/20

[#22977] Re: Ruby Time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/20

valodzka wrote:

[#22981] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/21

> I bet you'll get tired of updating that database. There's a major difference

[#22893] [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — David Martin <redmine@...>

Feature #1291: O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open

10 messages 2009/03/15

[#22939] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...>

Bug #1303: A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it

8 messages 2009/03/19

[#23063] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Damjan Rems <redmine@...>

Bug #1332: Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version

11 messages 2009/03/30

[#23075] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #1336: Change in string representation of Floats

37 messages 2009/03/31
[#23179] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/04/11

Issue #1336 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23181] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/11

[#23186] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/12

Hi,

[#23187] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/13

[#23188] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/13

Hi,

[ruby-core:22713] Re: suggestions for float

From: Brent Roman <brent@...>
Date: 2009-03-07 06:07:33 UTC
List: ruby-core #22713
How about this:

# return true if other (Numeric) is approximately equal
#eps is chosen such that =~ indicates whether self.to_s == other.to_s
#however, this is at least 30 times faster than comparing the results of
to_s
#if one were to code it in 'C', I suspect it would be >1000 times faster.

class Float
  @@eps = 5e-15
  def =~ other
    (self-other).abs < (@@eps*self).abs
  end
end

It works well for me.  Test it and see if it behaves as you would expect.

  f =~ g 

is similar enough to the standard "approximately equal" math symbol that I
hope many people would understand it at first glance. 

- brent


Roger Pack wrote:
> 
>> A variant of the float to string conversion that tries to preserve all
>> the
>> binary information would certainly be useful, but not as the default to_s
>> method.  That is, unless you think that:
>>
>> irb>  2.1 - 3.0
>> -0.8999999999999999
>>
>> would not be "surprising"!  (well, at least annoying)
> 
> At least users would be able to understand this:
>>> 2.1 - 3.0
> => -0.9
>>> (2.1-3.0) == -0.9
> => false
> 
> Since it would become
>>> 2.1 - 3.0
> => -0.8999999999999
>>> (2.1-3.0) == -0.9
> => false
> 
> I'd prefer the second--at least I'm reminded as to what's going on and
> don't have to constantly pester ruby talk with questions like "is this
> normal?" :)
> 
> However, this would seem surprising
>>> 0.9
> =>  0.90000000000000002
> 
> It seems slightly more annoying and verbose but more honest.
> That being said, as someone above mentioned, the current float default
> output is to "prettify" by stripping the ending few bits [I guess].
> Perhaps we should keep this around as a new method name.  Like
> to_human_string or something [?]
> 
> -=r
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ruby-core%3A22325--suggestions-for-float-tp22144150p22384821.html
Sent from the ruby-core mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


In This Thread