[ruby-core:21711] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc?

Michal,

I finally managed to get a working Ruby 1.8.7 on ppc64 with and without
MBARI patches
under OSx 10.5 as follows:

export ARCH_FLAG=3D"-arch ppc64"
CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -g -m64 -fno-stack-protector"  configure

There may yet be a problem with my build configuration, but I don't think
the MBARI patches have anything to do with these failures.
Both patched and unpatched versions fail the same 6 tests.
Does anyone have a ppc64 (64-bit code) Ruby that does not fail these tests?

Note that I am using the PowerPC patch of 1/23/09.  For now, it must be
applied manually
after the MBARI7 patch.  I will integrate it after it has been tested on
x86_64.
(It should be called the 64-bit patch, as it is intended to fix x86_64 as
well as ppc64)

http://sites.google.com/site/brentsrubypatches/Home/ruby-1.8.7-p72-mbariPPC=
.patch?attredirects=3D0

The PPC patch changes the meaning of the STACK_WIPE_SITES #define.
See rubysig.h for details.

One interesting observation is that my *unpatched* ppc64 ruby did not leak
when executing:

ruby -e "loop{@x=3Dcallcc{|c|c}}"

This could be because the ppc versions put ruby call arguments on the heap
rather than the 'C' stack.

- brent


results:

The patched ppc64 Ruby runs the test suite about 30 seconds quicker.
341 vs. 312 seconds
It used a bit less RAM, but the difference wasn't large:
114Mb vs. 106Mb peak VSIZE

I've included the details of the run below.
Can anyone verify whether or not these failures occur with unpatched
1.8.7-p72?

---------------

$ uname -a
Darwin G5-Client.shore.mbari.org 9.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.6.0: Thu Nov=
=20
6 19:35:49 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.9.57~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Mac

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-1-23 MBARI 7/0x5770 on patchlevel 72) [powerpc-darwin9.6.0=
]

$ file ~/bin/ruby
/u/brent/bin/ruby: Mach-O 64-bit executable ppc64

$ time ruby runner.rb
Loaded suite .
Started
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
............................................F..........................Warn=
ing:
OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use OpenSSL::PKCS7
instead
.Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
.Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
..............................FF....F......................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
./ruby/test_array.rb:536:
warning: given block not used
........................................................................F..=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
..........................E................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................................=
............................
Finished in 312.740792 seconds.

  1) Failure:
test_decode(OpenSSL::TestASN1) [./openssl/test_asn1.rb:195]:
<"\217\a\362~Q38\262\332\212H6N\244\022n\267\343I8\233\000\017|\361\265\024=
\335\353\202\237h\016\201\032bxV\300\343N\252\227w\320\263\241%\035s\366P\2=
147>dy\306\004\023\367\267\v\214\272\fY\331\326\016\346\216\003\310\323\ek+=
Y}is\361\263\034\313\f\006e\200V\274\302\222\201\314\260\350\210\321<G\317\=
024\260H\371+\002\350\210\216cHk\375\246\301\324c\363\324\203\225\330\221
\036"> expected but was
<"\246\317\022M\337\207
\202\022\374\221\214\375\365\307\231\030\375t\027\306Y.\022\302\207\377\224=
\234\370l\a\211\r\241\225\003\220d\323k\346[>\351\004M\v\347\336\240\365\26=
5\242\226\324?\214eR\300p\003`!m#\217\e6\250\306G\324#\004`\273\240\376\357=
`\265\367\3658\275t?\342\274\335.\370\261\227\325)V\376\240Z\276\206`\2056b=
\305\022s\tY%\025~r\207\267\323\226\315\243L\203\023\306K">.

  2) Failure:
test_create_by_factory(OpenSSL::TestX509Extension)
[./openssl/test_x509ext.rb:41]:
<"0\022\006\003U\035\023\001\001\000\004\b0\006\001\001\000\002\001\002">
expected but was
<"0\022\006\003U\035\023\001\001\377\004\b0\006\001\001\377\002\001\002">.

  3) Failure:
test_new(OpenSSL::TestX509Extension) [./openssl/test_x509ext.rb:29]:
<true> expected but was
<false>.

  4) Failure:
test_attr(OpenSSL::TestX509Request) [./openssl/test_x509req.rb:94]:
<[["keyUsage", "Digital Signature, Key Encipherment", true],
 ["subjectAltName", "email:[e-mail]", false]]> expected but
was
<[["keyUsage", "Digital Signature, Key Encipherment", false],
 ["subjectAltName", "email:[e-mail]", false]]>.

  5) Failure:
test_should_propagate_signaled(TestBeginEndBlock)
[./ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:81]:
<""> expected to be =3D~
</Interrupt$/>.

  6) Error:
test_fd_passing(TestUNIXSocket):
SocketError: file descriptor was not passed (msg_controllen=3D20, 24 expect=
ed)
    ./socket/test_unix.rb:19:in `recv_io'
    ./socket/test_unix.rb:19:in `test_fd_passing'

1976 tests, 1668917 assertions, 5 failures, 1 errors

real    5m23.872s
user    3m54.124s
sys     0m27.542s



Bugzilla from [e-mail] wrote:
>=20
>  I've tried that myself but it didn't work very well=20
> (ruby test/runner.rb fails 3 tests on 0x2770, and segfaults when i use
> 0x4770, =20
> on x86_64 machine)
>=20
> I also tried building on ppc64, with 0x4770 it wont even build, segfaults
> on=20
> launching miniruby:
>=20
> gcc -O2 -g    -DRUBY_EXPORT -D_GNU_SOURCE=3D1  -L.  -rdynamic -Wl,-export=
-
> dynamic   main.o  libruby-static.a -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o miniruby
> ./ext/purelib.rb:2: [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.8.7 (2009-1-18 MBARI 7/0x4770 on patchlevel 72) [powerpc64-linux]
> make: *** [.rbconfig.time] Aborted
>=20
> With 0x2770 it builds & runs the same test suite with 6 failures & 1
> error.=20
> (Although i'm not sure how much they are actually ruby's fault)
>=20
> Regards,
> -- mb
>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ruby-core%3A19846---Bu=
g--744--memory-leak-in-callcc--tp20447794p21773950.html
Sent from the ruby-core mailing list archive at Nabble.com.