[#21709] [Feature #1084] request for: Array#sort_by! — Radosław Bułat <redmine@...>

Feature #1084: request for: Array#sort_by!

15 messages 2009/02/01

[#21714] [BUG:trunk] Got the error message, after run 'gem install --test'. — Takao Kouji <kouji@...7.net>

Hi, Ryan.

14 messages 2009/02/01

[#21715] New documentation system! — Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso <grabber@...>

People,

35 messages 2009/02/01
[#21716] Re: New documentation system! — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2009/02/01

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso

[#21717] Re: New documentation system! — znmeb@... 2009/02/01

Quoting Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com>:

[#21718] Re: New documentation system! — Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso <grabber@...> 2009/02/01

People,

[#21719] Re: New documentation system! — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/01

One project that has been in the works for a while and shows a lot of

[#21731] Re: New documentation system! — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/02

I'd love to see a documentation system similar to what python has, and

[#21746] Re: New documentation system! — Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso <grabber@...> 2009/02/02

People,

[#21802] [Bug #1098] Unclear encoding error: #<Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xE2\x96\x80" from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1 in conversion from CP850 to ISO-8859-1> — Tom Link <redmine@...>

Bug #1098: Unclear encoding error: #<Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xE2\x96\x80" from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1 in conversion from CP850 to ISO-8859-1>

6 messages 2009/02/03

[#21838] What does this regexp mean - /\c#{_J}/ — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

I am combining the escaped control character syntax (\cX) with variable interpolation (#{var_name}). It seems nonsensical, and its probably only interesting for an academic interest (I am adding to the RubySpecs). It does not seem to match anything at all. Its almost the same output with both 1.8.6 and 1.9, but the warnings are given only in 1.8.6.

8 messages 2009/02/04

[#21893] [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Narihiro Nakamura <redmine@...>

Feature #1122: request for: Object#try

30 messages 2009/02/06
[#21907] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/02/07

Hi,

[#21909] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/07

Hi --

[#21923] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/02/08

Hi,

[#21932] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/08

Hi--

[#21968] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Michal Babej <calcifer@...> 2009/02/10

Hi,

[#21972] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/10

Hi --

[#21973] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?= <radek.bulat@...> 2009/02/11

Providing new syntax change for such a small thing is IMHO

[#22165] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/15

Count me in as a +1 on foo.?bar(baz). I'm on the fence about whether ?bar

[#22177] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Daniel Luz <dev@...> 2009/02/16

2009/2/15 Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>:

[#22219] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/02/18

> IMHO, foo.?bar should behave as "call-except-if-nil". Not only it

[#22226] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?= <radek.bulat@...> 2009/02/18

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#22230] Re: [Feature #1122] request for: Object#try — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/02/18

> Then how it is different from

[#21903] [Bug #1127] error while compiling Win32API under MinGW — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #1127: error while compiling Win32API under MinGW

15 messages 2009/02/07

[#21937] [Bug #1131] String#unpack("V") does not work correctly is linux on s390x — Ittay Dror <redmine@...>

Bug #1131: String#unpack("V") does not work correctly is linux on s390x

13 messages 2009/02/08

[#21946] New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — Brent Roman <brent@...>

36 messages 2009/02/10
[#21949] Re: New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2009/02/10

At Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:30:55 +0900,

[#21952] Re: New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/10

Hi --

[#21963] Re: New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2009/02/10

At Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:32:19 +0900,

[#21977] Re: New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2009/02/11

[#21980] Re: New hash : syntax for the 1.8 series? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/02/11

Hi,

[#21997] 1.8.7 Specifics — John Barnette <jbarnette@...>

There's a fair amount of talk lately about release management and

80 messages 2009/02/11
[#21999] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/02/11

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, John Barnette <jbarnette@gmail.com> wrote:

[#22004] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/11

Luis Lavena wrote:

[#22005] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/02/11

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#22007] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@...> 2009/02/11

2009/2/11 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#22008] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/02/11

Hi,

[#22024] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/02/12

[#22025] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/02/12

Hi,

[#22028] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2009/02/12

[#22048] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/02/13

Hello Ezra,

[#22049] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2009/02/13

[#22051] A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/02/13

Let me leave a memo to remember issues I can think of.

[#22054] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/13

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#22055] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/13

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#22079] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/02/14

Excerpts from Headius: Charles Oliver Nutter's message of Sat Feb 14 00:53:17 +0200 2009:

[#22091] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/14

Eero Saynatkari wrote:

[#22101] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/02/14

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#22107] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2009/02/14

[#22123] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/02/14

Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:

[#22128] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/02/15

Hi,

[#22132] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/02/15

[#22139] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/15

Brent Roman wrote:

[#22145] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/02/15

[#22152] Re: A short memorandum (Re: 1.8.7 Specifics) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/15

Brent Roman wrote:

[#22065] Dir.glob and duplicates? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

I was fixing a JRuby Dir.glob spec failure where we produced a duplicate

28 messages 2009/02/14
[#22066] Re: Dir.glob and duplicates? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/14

In article <4996749D.7050009@sun.com>,

[#22116] [Bug #1162] Build Assertion Failure with VC+++ - Incorrect flushing of stdout/stderr — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1162: Build Assertion Failure with VC+++ - Incorrect flushing of stdout/stderr

11 messages 2009/02/14

[#22206] ruby-1.9.1-p0 build failure on i586 — "Jeroen van Meeuwen (Fedora Project)" <kanarip@...>

Hi there,

12 messages 2009/02/18

[#22212] [Bug #1172] [sparc] *** glibc detected *** ruby1.9: free(): invalid pointer: 0xf7ef6a54 *** — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #1172: [sparc] *** glibc detected *** ruby1.9: free(): invalid pointer: 0xf7ef6a54 ***

12 messages 2009/02/18

[#22246] YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>

The idea is to make selectors like optional versions of Python imports.

137 messages 2009/02/19
[#22251] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/19

Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#22252] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/19

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#22262] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/02/19

[#22267] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/19

2009/2/19 Florian Gilcher <flo@andersground.net>

[#22285] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/02/20

[#22295] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/20

Ok, based on a bunch of comments I got from Aaron Patterson and John

[#22316] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/02/21

On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:39 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#22322] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2009/02/22

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 04:34:18AM +0900, Jim Weirich wrote:

[#22330] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/02/22

Excerpts from Aaron Patterson's message of Sun Feb 22 04:35:41 +0200 2009:

[#22409] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/02/24

Hi,

[#22427] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2009/02/24

On Feb 24, 2:07m, Yukihiro Matsumoto <m...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#22433] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/02/24

Excerpts from brixen's message of Wed Feb 25 00:04:34 +0200 2009:

[#22435] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/24

2009/2/24 Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org>

[#22441] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2009/02/25

On Feb 24, 3:17m, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:

[#22442] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/25

2009/2/24 Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com>

[#22446] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/02/25

I agree that this will be used in ways other than just framework creators. Rails and Merb may not use this to erect fences, but someone will. I think that before we go gung-ho on this, there should be a Devil's advocate discussion of how one could misuse this feature, and how it could cause problems. The problems may not warrant dropping the idea, they may just help see issues with it. I think that is a really good exercise that we should do.

[#22448] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/02/25

[#22449] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/02/25

[#22450] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/25

I'm also in favor of discussing this, but all I hear so far in opposition is

[#22460] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Florian Gilcher <flo@...> 2009/02/25

[#22471] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2009/02/25

On Feb 24, 9:17m, Yehuda Katz <wyc...@gmail.com> wrote:

[#22490] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Ola Bini <ola.bini@...> 2009/02/25

Yehuda Katz wrote:

[#22501] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2009/02/25

[#22495] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/02/25

Hi,

[#22506] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Ola Bini <ola.bini@...> 2009/02/25

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#22510] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/25

Ola Bini wrote:

[#22514] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Ola Bini <ola.bini@...> 2009/02/25

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#22521] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/02/25

Ola Bini wrote:

[#22522] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/02/25

[#22523] Re: YASNP (Yet Another Selector Namespace Proposal) — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...> 2009/02/25

2009/2/25 Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com>

[#22325] suggestions for float — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...>

Floating point rounding errors are common and "annoying"

20 messages 2009/02/22
[#22595] Re: suggestions for float — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/02/28

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack@gmail.com> wrote:

[#22621] Re: suggestions for float — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/02

Hi,

[#22624] Re: suggestions for float — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/02

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Mon Mar 02 12:46:27 +0200 2009:

[#22629] Re: suggestions for float — Kurt Stephens <kurt@...> 2009/03/02
[#22631] Re: suggestions for float — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/02

Excerpts from Kurt Stephens's message of Mon Mar 02 20:27:09 +0200 2009:

[#22336] Floats are freezeable and taintable? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

In adding an optimization for Float I realized that Float objects are

13 messages 2009/02/22

[#22353] [Bug #1195] String#% does not include prefix before zero value for # versions of numeric formats — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #1195: String#% does not include prefix before zero value for # versions of numeric formats

10 messages 2009/02/23
[#22397] Re: [Bug #1195] String#% does not include prefix before zero value for # versions of numeric formats — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/24

In article <49a25ec0ce233_84c7e8c1f8909a@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#22543] [Feature #1218] New method needed to set and get the current recursion limit — Conrad Taylor <redmine@...>

Feature #1218: New method needed to set and get the current recursion limit

12 messages 2009/02/26

[#22584] MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Brent Roman <brent@...>

16 messages 2009/02/28
[#22587] Re: MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/02/28

Hi,

[#22590] Re: MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/28

In article <49a9024b.0e0d6e0a.11f5.ffffee2f@mx.google.com>,

[#22599] Re: MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/02/28

[#22667] Re: MBARI8 patch fixes bugs caused by incorrect volatile variable declarations — Michael King <kingmt@...> 2009/03/04

I am having an issue with the MBARI patches. In our app the test suite has a

[ruby-core:21711] Re: [Bug #744] memory leak in callcc?

From: Brent Roman <brent@...>
Date: 2009-02-01 11:17:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #21711
Michal,

I finally managed to get a working Ruby 1.8.7 on ppc64 with and without
MBARI patches
under OSx 10.5 as follows:

export ARCH_FLAG="-arch ppc64"
CFLAGS="-O2 -g -m64 -fno-stack-protector"  configure

There may yet be a problem with my build configuration, but I don't think
the MBARI patches have anything to do with these failures.
Both patched and unpatched versions fail the same 6 tests.
Does anyone have a ppc64 (64-bit code) Ruby that does not fail these tests?

Note that I am using the PowerPC patch of 1/23/09.  For now, it must be
applied manually
after the MBARI7 patch.  I will integrate it after it has been tested on
x86_64.
(It should be called the 64-bit patch, as it is intended to fix x86_64 as
well as ppc64)

http://sites.google.com/site/brentsrubypatches/Home/ruby-1.8.7-p72-mbariPPC.patch?attredirects=0

The PPC patch changes the meaning of the STACK_WIPE_SITES #define.
See rubysig.h for details.

One interesting observation is that my *unpatched* ppc64 ruby did not leak
when executing:

ruby -e "loop{@x=callcc{|c|c}}"

This could be because the ppc versions put ruby call arguments on the heap
rather than the 'C' stack.

- brent


results:

The patched ppc64 Ruby runs the test suite about 30 seconds quicker.
341 vs. 312 seconds
It used a bit less RAM, but the difference wasn't large:
114Mb vs. 106Mb peak VSIZE

I've included the details of the run below.
Can anyone verify whether or not these failures occur with unpatched
1.8.7-p72?

---------------

$ uname -a
Darwin G5-Client.shore.mbari.org 9.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.6.0: Thu Nov 
6 19:35:49 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.9.57~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Mac

$ ruby -v
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-1-23 MBARI 7/0x5770 on patchlevel 72) [powerpc-darwin9.6.0]

$ file ~/bin/ruby
/u/brent/bin/ruby: Mach-O 64-bit executable ppc64

$ time ruby runner.rb
Loaded suite .
Started
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................F..........................Warning:
OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use OpenSSL::PKCS7
instead
.Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
.Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
Warning: OpenSSL::PKCS7::PKCS7 is deprecated after Ruby 1.9; use
OpenSSL::PKCS7 instead
..............................FF....F..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................../ruby/test_array.rb:536:
warning: given block not used
........................................................................F.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................E........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Finished in 312.740792 seconds.

  1) Failure:
test_decode(OpenSSL::TestASN1) [./openssl/test_asn1.rb:195]:
<"\217\a\362~Q38\262\332\212H6N\244\022n\267\343I8\233\000\017|\361\265\024\335\353\202\237h\016\201\032bxV\300\343N\252\227w\320\263\241%\035s\366P\2147>dy\306\004\023\367\267\v\214\272\fY\331\326\016\346\216\003\310\323\ek+Y}is\361\263\034\313\f\006e\200V\274\302\222\201\314\260\350\210\321<G\317\024\260H\371+\002\350\210\216cHk\375\246\301\324c\363\324\203\225\330\221
\036"> expected but was
<"\246\317\022M\337\207
\202\022\374\221\214\375\365\307\231\030\375t\027\306Y.\022\302\207\377\224\234\370l\a\211\r\241\225\003\220d\323k\346[>\351\004M\v\347\336\240\365\265\242\226\324?\214eR\300p\003`!m#\217\e6\250\306G\324#\004`\273\240\376\357`\265\367\3658\275t?\342\274\335.\370\261\227\325)V\376\240Z\276\206`\2056b\305\022s\tY%\025~r\207\267\323\226\315\243L\203\023\306K">.

  2) Failure:
test_create_by_factory(OpenSSL::TestX509Extension)
[./openssl/test_x509ext.rb:41]:
<"0\022\006\003U\035\023\001\001\000\004\b0\006\001\001\000\002\001\002">
expected but was
<"0\022\006\003U\035\023\001\001\377\004\b0\006\001\001\377\002\001\002">.

  3) Failure:
test_new(OpenSSL::TestX509Extension) [./openssl/test_x509ext.rb:29]:
<true> expected but was
<false>.

  4) Failure:
test_attr(OpenSSL::TestX509Request) [./openssl/test_x509req.rb:94]:
<[["keyUsage", "Digital Signature, Key Encipherment", true],
 ["subjectAltName", "email:gotoyuzo@ruby-lang.org", false]]> expected but
was
<[["keyUsage", "Digital Signature, Key Encipherment", false],
 ["subjectAltName", "email:gotoyuzo@ruby-lang.org", false]]>.

  5) Failure:
test_should_propagate_signaled(TestBeginEndBlock)
[./ruby/test_beginendblock.rb:81]:
<""> expected to be =~
</Interrupt$/>.

  6) Error:
test_fd_passing(TestUNIXSocket):
SocketError: file descriptor was not passed (msg_controllen=20, 24 expected)
    ./socket/test_unix.rb:19:in `recv_io'
    ./socket/test_unix.rb:19:in `test_fd_passing'

1976 tests, 1668917 assertions, 5 failures, 1 errors

real    5m23.872s
user    3m54.124s
sys     0m27.542s



Bugzilla from calcifer@runbox.com wrote:
> 
>  I've tried that myself but it didn't work very well 
> (ruby test/runner.rb fails 3 tests on 0x2770, and segfaults when i use
> 0x4770,  
> on x86_64 machine)
> 
> I also tried building on ppc64, with 0x4770 it wont even build, segfaults
> on 
> launching miniruby:
> 
> gcc -O2 -g    -DRUBY_EXPORT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1  -L.  -rdynamic -Wl,-export-
> dynamic   main.o  libruby-static.a -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o miniruby
> ./ext/purelib.rb:2: [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.8.7 (2009-1-18 MBARI 7/0x4770 on patchlevel 72) [powerpc64-linux]
> make: *** [.rbconfig.time] Aborted
> 
> With 0x2770 it builds & runs the same test suite with 6 failures & 1
> error. 
> (Although i'm not sure how much they are actually ruby's fault)
> 
> Regards,
> -- mb
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-ruby-core%3A19846---Bug--744--memory-leak-in-callcc--tp20447794p21773950.html
Sent from the ruby-core mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


In This Thread