ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle

From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Date: 2007-06-20 21:25:13 UTC

List: ruby-core #11521

On 20/06/07, Alexey Verkhovsky <alexey.verkhovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/20/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> > This time we released particular 1.8.6-p36, but p1 to p35 also exists
> > there.  They were not announced because announcing every patches is way
> > too annoying.  Imagine more than a dozen of release announcement made in
> > a day or two... I bet you just ignore everything.
>
> As a downstream packager of sorts (http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com),
> I would be delighted, not annoyed, to receive a message every couple
> of days (historical rate of patchlevel tags for 1.8.6) along the lines
> of "hi, I've just tagged patchlevel X, it fixes bugs Y and Z".
>
> I realize that the same information could be obtained by watching the
> 1_8_6 branch on Subversion, but that's extra digging for the knowledge
> you have in your head when you tag a patchlevel.
>
The commit messages should include that so it's only a matter of
sending the commit messages to some sort of mailing list to which
people could subscribe.
You should be able to get the equivalent with a web scraping tool as
long as the repository is web-accessible. Or a script that reads the
svn, iirc there are even ruby bindings.

Thanks

Michal

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next