[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/06/12

[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>

This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in

17 messages 2007/06/13

[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Does this look like a bug to anyone else?

10 messages 2007/06/16

[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months

20 messages 2007/06/20
[#11512] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/06/20

Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.

[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

10 messages 2007/06/27

Re: Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method

From: Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Date: 2007-06-16 12:05:01 UTC
List: ruby-core #11476
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method"
>     on Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:01:45 +0900, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> |This a bug?
> 
> No, to_ary is to convert non-array object into array when it's used as
> an operand.  In this case, Foo is not non-array nor operand.
 

Can we say then, as a general rule, that defining a custom to_ary method 
on an array object results in undefined behavior for certain methods?

Thanks,

Dan


In This Thread