[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/06/12

[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>

This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in

17 messages 2007/06/13

[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Does this look like a bug to anyone else?

10 messages 2007/06/16

[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months

20 messages 2007/06/20
[#11512] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/06/20

Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.

[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

10 messages 2007/06/27

Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?

From: "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
Date: 2007-06-12 03:50:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #11438
The array tests from ruby_tests are *much* better. Now I just have to make IronRuby pass them :)

Thanks!
-John

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com [mailto:Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com] On Behalf Of Charles Oliver Nutter
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 6:57 PM
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: Are there a better set of unit tests for Array?

John Lam (CLR) wrote:
> It seems like the unit tests that we have in Ruby.net were:
>
>
>
> a)      Extracted from the Ruby source distribution and
>
> b)      Not very comprehensive J
>

JRuby aggregates all tests that currently exist, so it's
one-stop-shopping if you care to have a look.

http://svn.codehaus.org/jruby/trunk/jruby/test

Search for *array*.rb

- Charlie



In This Thread

Prev Next