[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/06/12

[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>

This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in

17 messages 2007/06/13

[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Does this look like a bug to anyone else?

10 messages 2007/06/16

[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months

20 messages 2007/06/20
[#11512] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/06/20

Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.

[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

10 messages 2007/06/27

method_missing for Enumerator

From: TRANS <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-06-24 22:04:55 UTC
List: ruby-core #11533
What do others think of this for 1.9+?

  class Enumerable::Enumerator
    def method_missing(sym,*args,&blk)
      each{ |x| x.send(sym,*args,&blk) }
    end
  end

Seems safe enough to me. Am I right in thinking this? Yes, there is
some potential for uncaught NoMethodErrors, of course, but given the
nature of this, that should be pretty rare.

The benefit is a number of nice conveniences, eg.

  [1,2,3].map + 3   => [4,5,6]

  [1,2,3].select > 2   => [3]

  [1,2,3].reject > 1   => [1]

  [1,2,3].find > 1     => 2

T.

In This Thread

Prev Next