ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

[PATCH] Some small bug fixes for Ruby 1.9

From: "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Date: 2007-06-05 16:16:13 UTC

List: ruby-core #11406

Hi,

I have a small patch: The first stops irb's completion from crashing because of
methods, that now return symbols instead of strings. The second makes it
possible to build 1.9. with an installed Ruby 1.8. for bootstrapping.

-- 
Florian Frank

Attachments (1)

symbol-and-compile.patch (1.15 KB, text/x-diff)

Index: lib/irb/completion.rb
===================================================================
--- lib/irb/completion.rb	(revision 12440)
+++ lib/irb/completion.rb	(working copy)
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
 	rescue Exception
 	  candidates = []
 	end
-	candidates.grep(/^#{message}/).collect{|e| receiver + "::" + e}
+	candidates.grep(/^#{message}/).collect{|e| receiver.to_s + "::" + e}
 
       when /^(:[^:.]+)\.([^.]*)$/
 	# Symbol
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
       candidates.grep(/^#{message}/).collect do |e|
 	case e
 	when /^[a-zA-Z_]/
-	  receiver + "." + e
+	  receiver.to_s + "." + e
 	when /^[0-9]/
 	when *Operators
 	  #receiver + " " + e
Index: ext/extmk.rb
===================================================================
--- ext/extmk.rb	(revision 12440)
+++ ext/extmk.rb	(working copy)
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
       unless installrb.empty?
         config = CONFIG.dup
         install_dirs(target_prefix).each {|var, val| config[var] = val}
-        FileUtils.rm_f(installrb.values.collect {|f| RbConfig.expand(f, config)}, verbose: true)
+        FileUtils.rm_f(installrb.values.collect {|f| RbConfig.expand(f, config)}, :verbose => true)
       end
     end
     return false

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next