ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch

From: "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Date: 2007-06-30 19:27:52 UTC

List: ruby-core #11566

Hi,

For the moment I have been unable to reproduce the problem on my
environment (Leopard, ruby-1.8.6-p36 with --enable-pthread). James
graciously sent me some (private) code that triggers the bug on his
environment, but it doesn't happen on mine.

On Tiger with p36, we can reproduce the problem very easily with
--enable-pthread, but without --enable-pthread the bug seems to have
disappeared.

# We didn't receive (yet) any feedback regarding this bug from our
Leopard users community, which counts a non-negligible number of
people using Ruby.

I would be willing to apply any patch that would fix the problem if I
can manage to reproduce the bug on Leopard, but I have the feeling
that the problem might be elsewhere. I will continue to investigate in
the meantime.

Thanks a lot,
Laurent, Apple Inc.

On 6/30/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2007, at 4:51 AM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > James Edward Gray II wrote:
> >> What Apple was asking me for today is a small code snippet that shows
> >> the problem.  If anyone has such a thing, please share.
> >
> > I've not yet succeed to make one, but perhaps Nobu did.  He gave us
> > two
> > patches:
> >
> > http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-dev/30822
> > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?
> > func=detail&aid=11507&group_id=426&atid=1698
> >
> > Would you mind trying them?
>
> Yeah, we have found the fixes.  What we need is to reliably be able
> to see the problem.  That way Apple can decide if they need to resort
> to a fix.
>
> James Edward Gray II
>
>

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next