[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/06/12

[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>

This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in

17 messages 2007/06/13

[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Does this look like a bug to anyone else?

10 messages 2007/06/16

[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months

20 messages 2007/06/20
[#11512] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/06/20

Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.

[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

10 messages 2007/06/27

Re: Procs and bindings in 1.9

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2007-06-02 00:53:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #11393
Hi,

In message "Re: Procs and bindings in 1.9"
    on Sat, 2 Jun 2007 08:01:04 +0900, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:

|The Proc#binding method has disappeared in 1.9.0 (my build is from two 
|days ago), although its rdoc comment is still there...
|
|Also Kernel.eval() won't accept a Proc as its second argument.
|
|Are these intentional changes, or have these features simply not been 
|implemented in YARV yet?

I will ask the YARV maintainer.  Wait for a while.

							matz.

In This Thread