ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

Re: Error in ancestor?

From: "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

Date: 2007-06-16 14:24:12 UTC

List: ruby-core #11479

On 6/16/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I just observed this (and it cost me quite some effort to debug my code :( )
>
> 515/15 > ruby -ve 'class << Class::new; puts self; puts ancestors.inspect end'
> ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-04 patchlevel 2) [i686-linux]
> #<Class:#<Class:0xb7dfae50>>
> [Class, Module, Object, Kernel]
>
>
> this seems to be in contradiction with
> http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Module.html#M001700
> stating
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   mod.ancestors → array
>
> Returns a list of modules included in mod (including mod itself).
>                                                                  =============
>
>    module Mod
>      include Math
>      include Comparable
>    end
>
>    Mod.ancestors    #=> [Mod, Comparable, Math]
>    Math.ancestors   #=> [Math]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Is this an error in doc or in behavior?

ancestors is one of those methods, like class, which skip over
singleton classes.

-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next