[#11383] Re: $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Daz,
[#11396] Re: $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Sylvain,
[#11401] Proc.== — David Flanagan <david@...>
Can anyone construct two proc objects p1 and p2, without using clone or
Hi,
Okay, anything other than the degenerate case of a proc with no body?
On Jun 4, 2007, at 22:57, David Flanagan wrote:
[#11409] Method introspection ? — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>
Hello,
[#11418] currying in Ruby — David Flanagan <david@...>
I've written a little argument currying module for Procs and Methods. I
[#11431] Are there a better set of unit tests for Array? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
It seems like the unit tests that we have in Ruby.net were:
[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 6/12/07, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi <nakahiro@sarion.co.jp> wrote:
[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>
This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in
On 6/13/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
On 6/13/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#11457] Inclusion of bug #9376 in 1.8.6 branch — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
Would it be possible to include the fix for bug #9376 in 1.8.6 ? It is not
[#11462] What should this code do? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
Thinking about control flow these days ...
[#11472] Strange Array#transpose behavior for custom to_ary method — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Ruby 1.8.6 p36
[#11481] Ancestors for Singleton classes — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
I am taking this away from ruby-talk as it contains patches.
[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Does this look like a bug to anyone else?
James Edward Gray II wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 16, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Vincent Isambart wrote:
> > It is because the and サ characters are not in ISO-8859-1.
[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months
> could you refer to bug #s?
Hi,
Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.
On 6/20/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11533] method_missing for Enumerator — TRANS <transfire@...>
What do others think of this for 1.9+?
[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
Hi,
On Jun 30, 2007, at 4:51 AM, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
I haven't seen it mentioned explicitly in this thread so far, but I
[#11545] Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
class Proc
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:43:14 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?
Re: Proc.==
On Jun 4, 2007, at 22:57, David Flanagan wrote:
> Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
>> Hi,
>> At Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:37:08 +0900,
>> David Flanagan wrote in [ruby-core:11401]:
>>> Can anyone construct two proc objects p1 and p2, without using
>>> clone or dup, so that p1==p2 but p1.object_id != p2.object_id?
>> p proc{} == proc{}
>>> Based on this, I would think that:
>>>
>>> lambda {|x| x*x } == lambda {|x| x*x }
>>>
>>> But this expression return false in both ruby 1.8 and 1.9.
>> Procs have each own contexts.
>
> Okay, anything other than the degenerate case of a proc with no body?
>
> proc{0} != proc{0}
> proc{nil} != proc{nil}
>
> I still contend that the documentation gives the mistaken
> impression that == can be used to compare the source code of the
> bodies of two procs.
A proc is more than just its body.
If you want to compare source code bodies, use ruby2ruby.