ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle

From: "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Date: 2007-06-20 16:47:09 UTC

List: ruby-core #11519

On 20/06/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.
>
> Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be possible to have "hotfixes" (i.e.: quick patchlevel
> > releases) when this kind of bugs happen ?
> >
>
> Well, use Subversion.
>
> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/tags
> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/tags/
>
> This time we released particular 1.8.6-p36, but p1 to p35 also exists
> there.  They were not announced because announcing every patches is way
> too annoying.  Imagine more than a dozen of release announcement made in
> a day or two... I bet you just ignore everything.
>
> Anyway 3 months of release interval is not that long I feel.  Remember
> there were only one chance in a year (i.e. 25th Dec.) to release a ruby
> in ancient days.  Releasing too frequently is annoying as I wrote. 3
> months is at once moderately long, moderately short.
>

I think that shortening the release interval is not the thing that is needed.

I would suggest to publish a release candidate tarball, wait for a
month or so, and see how many problems are found.
If there are only minor glitches just fix them and make a release. If
there are many or serious problems, put in the fixes, and publish
another candidate.

Thanks

Michal

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next