[#11439] comments needed for Random class — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2007/06/12

[#11450] Re: new method dispatch rule (matz' proposal) — David Flanagan <david@...>

This is a late response to the very long thread that started back in

17 messages 2007/06/13

[#11482] Ruby Changes Its Mind About Non-Word Characters — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Does this look like a bug to anyone else?

10 messages 2007/06/16

[#11505] Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for three months

20 messages 2007/06/20
[#11512] Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/06/20

Hi, I'm the 1.8.6 branch manager.

[#11543] Re: Apple reportedly to ship with ruby 1.8.6-p36 unless informed what to patch — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

On Jun 27, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:

10 messages 2007/06/27

Re: Proc.==

From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2007-06-05 21:38:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #11411
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:48 , David Flanagan wrote:

> I understand.  My point is that the Proc.== documentation says:
>
>      Return +true+ if _prc_ is the same object as _other_proc_, or if
>      they are both procs with the same body.

 >> p = proc { 42 }
=> #<Proc:0x0033912c@(irb):3>
 >> p == p.dup
=> true


In This Thread