ruby-core

So, is it correct to assume that for language constructs that create built-in types like Range, Array, Hash etc that user-defined initialize methods are never called?

[#11549] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/06/28

> -----Original Message-----

[#11550] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:24:48 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[#11553] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2007/06/28

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0900, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#11554] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/06/28

> ... for language constructs that create

[#11560] Re: Proc initialize method not called under certain circumstances — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11548] NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

If you do:

3 messages 2007/06/28

[#11557] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11559] Re: NilClass, TrueClass, FalseClass special cased for singleton classes? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/06/29

John Lam (CLR) wrote:

[#11555] Name of Classes — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>

Moin, moin!

2 messages 2007/06/28

[#11558] Re: Name of Classes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Moin,

[#11556] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/06/29

[#11561] Re: [BUG] delete_if with destructive methods in block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/06/29

Hi,

[#11567] Re: delete_if with destructive methods in block — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2007/06/30

That fixes it for me. I got no regressions from Rubinius' hash spec

[#11562] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Florian Gross <florgro@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/06/29

[#11563] Re: [BUG] Can clear frozen array using initialize() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/06/30

Hi,

Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Date: 2007-06-20 13:41:20 UTC

List: ruby-core #11516

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nobuyoshi Nakada [mailto:nobu@ruby-lang.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:37 AM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: Question about the patchlevel release cycle
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> At Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:03:28 +0900,
> Sylvain Joyeux wrote in [ruby-core:11511]:
> > > > > > 1.8.6 thread support was broken in bad ways. It stayed for 
> > > > > > three months
> > > >   unfortunately, I don't find the bugreport. It has 
> been discussed 
> > > > first on ruby-core and then opened (as far as I remember)
> > > >   See ruby-core:10594
> > > And the next report is [ruby-dev:30653], which the following code 
> > > dumps core.
> > 
> > Could you explain more what you're meaning ? (it does not 
> crash here, 
> > with p36
> > and the patch attached to bug #11507)
> 
> [ruby-dev:30653] is for 2007-03-20, and p36 does contain the 
> patch to fix it.  Indeed it's curious that it doesn't crash 
> with the #11507 patch.

I submitted a minor patch (#11709) today:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=11709&group_id=42
6&atid=1700

Look like you had an rb_ensure() call using a void as its first
argument. I don't know if it's related to this issue or not.

Regards,

Dan


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next