[#10467] Module re-inclusion in 1.9 vs 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
Some months ago I noticed that the semantics of module inclusion had
[#10468] Floats that are NaN have strange behavior — Jonas Kongslund <jonas@...>
Hi
[#10478] Plan to add ext/digest/lib/digest/hmac.rb to 1.8.6 or 1.8.7? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#10480] Ruby 1.8.6 delayed for seven days — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
I am afraid I have to announce that Ruby 1.8.6 final release will be
[#10490] Join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>
This patch adds the ability to give the Array#join method a block like so
[#10492] Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 04:16, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 10:46, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:07, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#10494] make check for 1.8.6-preview3: TestDBM: DBMError: dbm_store failed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9031, was opened at 2007-03-04 12:57
[#10507] Dynamic Array#join with block — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9055, was opened at 2007-03-05 19:57
Hi,
On 06/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 06/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 09/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10536] DRb freezes YARV? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
dear all,
[#10552] ruby 1.8.5p12: default IO object for gets() ? — Unknown <borg@...3.net>
Hello..
[#10563] Ruby 1.8.6 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hello,
[#10575] 'rescue' with non-exception class — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I was just caught out by this odd behaviour: a 'rescue' clause doesn't
[#10580] Kernel#exec on OSX — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>
Does anyone know how to explain this:
[#10585] Bugfix: Extension Compile Error with 1.8.6 — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
[#10594] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
In ext/thread/thread.c, remove_one leaves the list in an inconsistent state.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:57 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
> > The fix is in thread-mutex-remove_one.diff.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:19:04 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 17:29, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:48:42 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
Here the next one (hopefully the last)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:11:41 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:07:30 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
At Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:18:19 +0900,
> Which set of patches do you think should be committed? The former to
[#10615] Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...>
Hi--
On 3/15/07, Tom Pollard <tomp@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 11:46 PM, TRANS wrote:
On 3/16/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#10646] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9376, was opened at 2007-03-19 15:58
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 18:01, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hi,
On 3/19/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
> |But what if that singleton class just contained a method that allowed
Hi,
[#10701] Discrepancy between GetoptLong.new and documentation — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8384, was opened at 2007-02-02 10:06
> -----Original Message-----
[#10705] Google Summer of Code proposal. — "Pedro Del Gallego" <pedro.delgallego@...>
Hi,
On 3/21/07, Pedro Del Gallego <pedro.delgallego@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10711] Re: Extensions to ipaddr.rb — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Is this your intention?
[#10712] Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/21/07, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
On 3/21/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:26:38PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On 3/22/07, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
On 3/23/07, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10729] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9462, was opened at 22/03/2007 11:19
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10746] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35
Hi,
[#10749] class_extension — TRANS <transfire@...>
I'm just following up to find out the status of consideration for
[#10768] Lastest Version IRHG - Technical Review Requested — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
TO: CORE
[#10798] Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
I was wondering if someone could help me understand why there's a parallel =
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:44:16 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing the eigenclass hack.
John Lam (CLR) wrote:
[#10818] Bug in Net::HTTP#keep_alive? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Sometimes Apache will send a connection header like this:
Should I submit a bug for this? I guess I'm not sure what proper
[#10826] Comparable module and values of <=> operator — David Flanagan <david@...>
The rdoc for the Comparable module and its methods consistently indicate
Replying to my own post...
I think there's nothing wrong with the implementation and documentation.
[ ruby-Bugs-9525 ] Inclusion of OpenSSL makes Ruby segfault
Bugs item #9525, was opened at 2007-03-24 22:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9525&group_id=426
Category: None
Group: 1.9.x
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: NM RN (knyt)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Inclusion of OpenSSL makes Ruby segfault
Initial Comment:
Adding 'openssl' to ext/Setup produces this on any execution:
###
-- stack frame ------------
-- control frame ----------
c:0001 p:---- s:0000 b:-001 l:000000 d:000000 ------
---------------------------
-- backtrace of native function call (Use addr2line) --
0x815a5ea
0x80ce070
0x8133bf8
0xffffe420
0x807f005
0x806ab8f
0x8131c9b
0x8133594
0x813277d
0x81330f7
0x80d48ae
0x806aa6a
0xb7c46878
0x806a9a1
-------------------------------------------------------
[BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.0 (2007-03-23) [i686-linux]
Aborted
###
Running those addresses through addr2line on {src}/ruby:
###
/home/kennyt/ruby/vm_dump.c:603
/home/kennyt/ruby/error.c:164
/home/kennyt/ruby/signal.c:459
??:0
/home/kennyt/ruby/ext/openssl/ossl_asn1.c:1123
ext/extinit.c:15
/home/kennyt/ruby/ruby.c:374
/home/kennyt/ruby/ruby.c:1009
/home/kennyt/ruby/ruby.c:881
/home/kennyt/ruby/ruby.c:1274
/home/kennyt/ruby/eval.c:146
/home/kennyt/ruby/main.c:47
??:0
??:0
###
This crash has been in the trunk for a while now, so I guess it hasn't been noticed.
OpenSSL 0.9.8d 28 Sep 2006
OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
This is the test file:
###
puts 'test'
###
./miniruby test.rb, of course, works fine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: NM RN (knyt)
Date: 2007-03-24 22:19
Message:
user@host ~/ruby $ gdb ./ruby
GNU gdb 6.6
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show
warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"...
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(gdb) run test.rb
Starting program: /home/user/ruby/ruby test.rb
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1211832656 (LWP 6409)]
[New Thread -1211835488 (LWP 6412)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1211832656 (LWP 6409)]
0x080d6097 in rb_attr (klass=3082248120, id=15488, read=1,
write=1, ex=2)
at eval_intern.h:232
232 return th_get_cref(th, cfp->iseq, cfp);
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080d6097 in rb_attr (klass=3082248120, id=15488,
read=1, write=1, ex=2)
at eval_intern.h:232
#1 0x0807f325 in Init_ossl_asn1 () at ossl_asn1.c:1122
#2 0x0806aeaf in Init_ext () at ext/extinit.c:15
#3 0x0813208b in require_libraries () at ruby.c:373
#4 0x08133984 in load_file (fname=0xbfe37425 "test.rb",
script=<value optimized out>) at ruby.c:1009
#5 0x08132b6d in proc_options (argc=<value optimized out>,
argv=<value optimized out>) at ruby.c:878
#6 0x081334e7 in ruby_process_options (argc=2,
argv=0xbfe370e4) at ruby.c:1272
#7 0x080d4c9e in ruby_options (argc=2, argv=0xbfe370e4) at
eval.c:140
#8 0x0806ad8a in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x0
) at main.c:46
(gdb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9525&group_id=426