[#10492] Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2007/03/04
[#10500] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/03/05

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#10507] Dynamic Array#join with block — <noreply@...>

Patches item #9055, was opened at 2007-03-05 19:57

12 messages 2007/03/05
[#10520] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9055 ] Dynamic Array#join with block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/03/06

Hi,

[#10594] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

In ext/thread/thread.c, remove_one leaves the list in an inconsistent state.

15 messages 2007/03/14
[#10596] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:57 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10597] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/14

> > The fix is in thread-mutex-remove_one.diff.

[#10598] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:19:04 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10599] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/14

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 17:29, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#10600] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:48:42 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10615] Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...>

Hi--

16 messages 2007/03/15
[#10619] Re: Multiton in standard library — Tom Pollard <tomp@...> 2007/03/16

[#10620] Re: Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...> 2007/03/16

On 3/15/07, Tom Pollard <tomp@earthlink.net> wrote:

[#10646] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9376, was opened at 2007-03-19 15:58

12 messages 2007/03/19
[#10647] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/03/19

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10648] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/19

On Monday 19 March 2007 18:01, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#10651] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/03/19

Hi,

[#10665] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — "Chris Carter" <cdcarter@...> 2007/03/20

On 3/19/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10712] Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

10 messages 2007/03/21
[#10715] Re: Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2007/03/22

On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10798] Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

I was wondering if someone could help me understand why there's a parallel =

12 messages 2007/03/28
[#10799] Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/28

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:44:16 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released

From: Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
Date: 2007-03-05 16:10:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #10504
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> At Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:16:50 +0900,
> Hugh Sasse wrote in [ruby-core:10500]:
> > compiling tk
> > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/export/home/Scratch/hgs/ruby-1.8.6-preview3/ext/tk'
> > gcc -I. -I../.. -I../../. -I../.././ext/tk -DHAVE_TCL_H -DHAVE_TK_H  -DWITH_TCL_ENABLE_THREAD=0 -fPIC -g -O2  -c tcltklib.c
> > gcc -I. -I../.. -I../../. -I../.././ext/tk -DHAVE_TCL_H -DHAVE_TK_H  -DWITH_TCL_ENABLE_THREAD=0 -fPIC -g -O2  -c stubs.c
> > In file included from ../../ruby.h:24,
> >                  from stubs.c:2:
> > ../../config.h:15:1: warning: "_FILE_OFFSET_BITS" redefined
> > In file included from /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/include/iso/stdio_iso.h:44,
> >                  from /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/include/stdio.h:36,
> >                  from /usr/local/include/tcl.h:158,
> >                  from stubs.h:1,
> >                  from stubs.c:1:
> > /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.1/include/sys/feature_tests.h:105:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> 
> Doesn't it disappear by inverting two lines at the head of
> ext/tk/stubs.c?

Yes, that fixes that one.
> 
> > ./miniruby  ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb" --basedir="./test" --runner=console 
> > /export/home/Scratch/hgs/ruby-1.8.6-preview3/lib/net/imap.rb:204: uninitialized constant Net::IMAP::SSL (NameError)
> >         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require'
> >         from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require'
> 
> Can you try without rubygems?

What is the correct way to turn that feature off, please?  Then I'll let
you know.  Thank you.
> 
> -- 
> Nobu Nakada
> 
        Hugh

In This Thread