[#10492] Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2007/03/04
[#10500] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/03/05

On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#10507] Dynamic Array#join with block — <noreply@...>

Patches item #9055, was opened at 2007-03-05 19:57

12 messages 2007/03/05
[#10520] Re: [ ruby-Patches-9055 ] Dynamic Array#join with block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/03/06

Hi,

[#10594] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

In ext/thread/thread.c, remove_one leaves the list in an inconsistent state.

15 messages 2007/03/14
[#10596] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:57 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10597] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/14

> > The fix is in thread-mutex-remove_one.diff.

[#10598] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:19:04 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10599] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/14

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 17:29, MenTaLguY wrote:

[#10600] Re: [PATCH] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/14

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:48:42 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:

[#10615] Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...>

Hi--

16 messages 2007/03/15
[#10619] Re: Multiton in standard library — Tom Pollard <tomp@...> 2007/03/16

[#10620] Re: Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...> 2007/03/16

On 3/15/07, Tom Pollard <tomp@earthlink.net> wrote:

[#10646] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #9376, was opened at 2007-03-19 15:58

12 messages 2007/03/19
[#10647] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/03/19

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10648] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/03/19

On Monday 19 March 2007 18:01, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#10651] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/03/19

Hi,

[#10665] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-9376 ] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — "Chris Carter" <cdcarter@...> 2007/03/20

On 3/19/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10712] Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

10 messages 2007/03/21
[#10715] Re: Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2007/03/22

On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10798] Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

I was wondering if someone could help me understand why there's a parallel =

12 messages 2007/03/28
[#10799] Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/03/28

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:44:16 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:

[ ruby-Bugs-9508 ] some ruby gems fail to install

From: <noreply@...>
Date: 2007-03-24 04:16:25 UTC
List: ruby-core #10766
Bugs item #9508, was opened at 2007-03-23 18:42
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9508&group_id=426

Category: Standard Library
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 3
Submitted By: vincent Angeloni (vinnie-bob)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: some ruby gems fail to install

Initial Comment:
Hi -- I'm a noob so this may be something really simple.

I've tried to install a few gems and have installed gruff,color-tools,hoe,image_science,midilib,pdf-writer,progressbar,rake,rubyforge without problems. 

I tried to install scrubyt and it failed with error reported similar to below. I subsequently tried to install hpricot and mechanize by themselves and these failed also, as below:

----
G5-QUAD:~ vangelon$ sudo gem install hpricot
Select which gem to install for your platform (powerpc-darwin8.0)
 1. hpricot 0.5 (ruby)
 2. hpricot 0.5 (mswin32)
 3. hpricot 0.4 (mswin32)
 4. hpricot 0.4 (ruby)
 5. Skip this gem
 6. Cancel installation
> 1
Building native extensions.  This could take a while...
ERROR:  While executing gem ... (Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError)
    ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.

ruby extconf.rb install hpricot
can't find header files for ruby.


Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hpricot-0.5 for inspection.
Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/hpricot-0.5/ext/hpricot_scan/gem_make.out
----

I'm on a Mac G5 Quad, 10.4.9, ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [powerpc-darwin8.0]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Ryan Davis (zenspider)
Date: 2007-03-23 21:16

Message:
rubygems is not part of the standard ruby distribution, so normally I'd just reject this bug and close it... BUT... what you're experiencing is apple's broken ruby install. I believe there is a rubygem you can install to fix it up or you can remove/rename this ruby (and associated programs) and install your own (preferably in /usr/local/bin--don't forget to fix your PATH).

Google should answer questions for either path you choose.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9508&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next