[#10467] Module re-inclusion in 1.9 vs 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
Some months ago I noticed that the semantics of module inclusion had
[#10468] Floats that are NaN have strange behavior — Jonas Kongslund <jonas@...>
Hi
[#10478] Plan to add ext/digest/lib/digest/hmac.rb to 1.8.6 or 1.8.7? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#10480] Ruby 1.8.6 delayed for seven days — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
I am afraid I have to announce that Ruby 1.8.6 final release will be
[#10490] Join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>
This patch adds the ability to give the Array#join method a block like so
[#10492] Ruby 1.8.6 preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 04:16, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 10:46, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 12:07, Hugh Sasse wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
[#10494] make check for 1.8.6-preview3: TestDBM: DBMError: dbm_store failed — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9031, was opened at 2007-03-04 12:57
[#10507] Dynamic Array#join with block — <noreply@...>
Patches item #9055, was opened at 2007-03-05 19:57
Hi,
On 06/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 06/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On 09/03/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10536] DRb freezes YARV? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
dear all,
[#10552] ruby 1.8.5p12: default IO object for gets() ? — Unknown <borg@...3.net>
Hello..
[#10563] Ruby 1.8.6 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hello,
[#10575] 'rescue' with non-exception class — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I was just caught out by this odd behaviour: a 'rescue' clause doesn't
[#10580] Kernel#exec on OSX — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>
Does anyone know how to explain this:
[#10585] Bugfix: Extension Compile Error with 1.8.6 — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>
Hello,
[#10594] grave bug in 1.8.6's thread implementation — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
In ext/thread/thread.c, remove_one leaves the list in an inconsistent state.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:15:57 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
> > The fix is in thread-mutex-remove_one.diff.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:19:04 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 17:29, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:48:42 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
Here the next one (hopefully the last)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:11:41 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, MenTaLguY wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:07:30 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
At Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:18:19 +0900,
> Which set of patches do you think should be committed? The former to
[#10615] Multiton in standard library — TRANS <transfire@...>
Hi--
On 3/15/07, Tom Pollard <tomp@earthlink.net> wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 11:46 PM, TRANS wrote:
On 3/16/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#10646] Marshal.dump shouldn't complain about singletons if the _dump method is defined — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9376, was opened at 2007-03-19 15:58
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 18:01, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hi,
On 3/19/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
> |But what if that singleton class just contained a method that allowed
Hi,
[#10701] Discrepancy between GetoptLong.new and documentation — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8384, was opened at 2007-02-02 10:06
> -----Original Message-----
[#10705] Google Summer of Code proposal. — "Pedro Del Gallego" <pedro.delgallego@...>
Hi,
On 3/21/07, Pedro Del Gallego <pedro.delgallego@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10711] Re: Extensions to ipaddr.rb — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Is this your intention?
[#10712] Ruby Method Signatures (was Re: Multiton in standard library) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>
On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/21/07, Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote:
On 3/21/07, TRANS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:26:38PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On 3/22/07, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
On 3/23/07, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10729] BUGS in metaclasses inheritance — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9462, was opened at 22/03/2007 11:19
noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10746] sub-process with Test::Unit does not exit error code as expected — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #9300, was opened at 2007-03-15 03:35
Hi,
[#10749] class_extension — TRANS <transfire@...>
I'm just following up to find out the status of consideration for
[#10768] Lastest Version IRHG - Technical Review Requested — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
TO: CORE
[#10798] Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>
I was wondering if someone could help me understand why there's a parallel =
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:44:16 +0900, "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing the eigenclass hack.
John Lam (CLR) wrote:
[#10818] Bug in Net::HTTP#keep_alive? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Sometimes Apache will send a connection header like this:
Should I submit a bug for this? I guess I'm not sure what proper
[#10826] Comparable module and values of <=> operator — David Flanagan <david@...>
The rdoc for the Comparable module and its methods consistently indicate
Replying to my own post...
I think there's nothing wrong with the implementation and documentation.
Re: 1.8.6 timeut.rb segfault
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> At Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:40:42 +0900,
> Hugh Sasse wrote in [ruby-core:10574]:
> > I've just received this message from cron.
>
> > Your "cron" job on brains
> > /usr/local/bin/erb /home/hgs/public_html/ruby/ruby_sites.eruby >
> > /home/hgs/public_html/ruby/ruby_sites.html
>
> Can't you show reproducable code, or backtrace?
Yes, but it's from an erb job run by cron, and that's all I got from cron
It was working fine till I upgraded
12 7,18 * * * /usr/local/bin/erb /home/hgs/public_html/ruby/ruby_sites.eruby > /home/hgs/public_html/ruby/ruby_sites.html
:r /home/hgs/public_html/ruby/ruby_sites.eruby
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>List of Active Ruby Sites</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>List of active Ruby Sites</h1>
<%
require 'net/http'
require 'uri'
require 'date'
require 'timeout'
# Get a list of sites to process
class Site
attr_accessor :url, :name, :date, :failed
def initialize(url, name)
@url = url; @name = name;
@date = DateTime.now;
@failed = false
end
end
Sites = [Site.new('http://www.ruby-lang.org/', 'www.ruby-lang.org/'),
Site.new('http://redhanded.hobix.com/', 'Redhanded'),
Site.new('http://www.ruby-doc.org/', 'Ruby-doc'),
Site.new('http://www.rubyquiz.com/', 'Ruby Quiz'),
Site.new('http://rubyforge.org/', 'RubyForge'),
Site.new('http://rubyxml.com/', 'Ruby XML'),
Site.new('http://raa.ruby-lang.org/', 'Ruby
Application Archive'),
Site.new('http://www.rubygarden.org/', 'RubyGarden')]
Sites.each {|site|
uri = URI.parse(site.url)
host = uri.host
port = uri.port
path = uri.path
begin
Timeout::timeout(300) {
Net::HTTP.start(host, port) {|http|
response = http.request_head(path)
if response.key?('last-modified')
site.date = DateTime.parse(response['last-modified'])
else
site.date = DateTime.civil(1970)
end
}
}
rescue Timeout::Error
site.failed = true
end
}
%>
<p>Note, Dates of 1970 mean the server doesn't provide a
Last-Modified: header.</p>
<ul><% Sites.sort_by{|x| x.date}.reverse.each{|site|
unless site.failed
%>
<li><a href="<%= site.url %>"><%= site.name %> ...
[<%= site.date.to_s %>]</a></li>
<% else %>
<li> Could not access <a href="<%= site.url %>"><%=
site.name %> </li>
<% end %>
<% } %></ul>
<p>Page generated <%= DateTime.now %> with erb </p>
</body>
</html>
Running that command line by hand gives ... no errors now.
Nothing like a live demonstration of a problem to make it disappear.
OK can I make timeout fail anyway
brains hgs 31 %> vim timeout_error.rb
brains hgs 32 %> ./timeout_error.rb
execution expired
brains hgs 33 %> ./timeout_error.rb
execution expired
brains hgs 34 %> ./timeout_error.rb
execution expired
brains hgs 35 %> cat !$
cat ./timeout_error.rb
#!/usr/local/bin/ruby -w
require 'timeout'
begin
Timeout::timeout(3) {
sleep 5
}
rescue Timeout::Error => e
puts e
end
brains hgs 36 %>
Apparently not. :-(
Any suggestions as to how I can make the failure more verbose next time
so I can give you something you can use? If it fails again....
>
> --
> Nobu Nakada
>
>
Thank you, and apologies for the uselessness of this report.
Hugh