From: "John Lam (CLR)" Date: 2007-03-31T01:43:34+09:00 Subject: Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? --_000_372109E149E8084D8E6C7D9CFD82E0631E76D77453NAEXMSGC115re_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now that would be crazy now, wouldn't it? J From: Alexey Verkhovsky [mailto:alexey.verkhovsky@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:26 PM To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org Subject: Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why? On 3/28/07, John Lam (CLR) = > wrote: Is this how things are actually implemented? (BTW I'm not lazy here - we ca= nnot look for ourselves). Sorry for being curious. Does this phrase mean that you are reimplementing = Ruby (a complex language with no formal specification), and you are not all= owed to look at the source code of the "reference implementation"? -- Alex Verkhovsky --_000_372109E149E8084D8E6C7D9CFD82E0631E76D77453NAEXMSGC115re_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Now that would be crazy now, wouldn’t it? J

From: Alexey Verkho= vsky [mailto:alexey.verkhovsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:26 PM
To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: Virtual classes and 'real' classes -- why?

On 3/28/07, John Lam (CLR)= <jflam@microsoft.com> wrot= e:

Is this how things are actually implemented? (BTW I'm = not lazy here - we cannot look for ourselves).

Sorry for being curious. Does this phrase mean that yo= u are reimplementing Ruby (a complex language with no formal specification), and = you are not allowed to look at the source code of the "reference implement= ation"?

--
Alex Verkhovsky

--_000_372109E149E8084D8E6C7D9CFD82E0631E76D77453NAEXMSGC115re_--