[#10853] Why limit class def to a constant or colon node? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Is there a historical reason why I can't do something like these:

12 messages 2007/04/03

[#10933] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10140, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:32

10 messages 2007/04/16
[#10934] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — nobu@... 2007/04/16

Hi,

[#10960] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/18

On 4/16/07, nobu@ruby-lang.org <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10967] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/04/19

Hi,

[#10970] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10140 ] Cannot build with extra library path if previous version already installed — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/04/19

On 4/19/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:> Hi,>> At Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:21:44 +0900,> Michal Suchanek wrote in [ruby-core:10960]:> > Yes. And this should also apply to extensions. The mkmf tests are now> > fine but the extension is linked with -L/sw/lib before -L../..>> Indeed.>>> Index: configure.in> ===================================================================> --- configure.in (revision 12191)> +++ configure.in (working copy)> @@ -1385,5 +1385,4 @@ if test "$enable_rpath" = yes; then> fi>> -LDFLAGS="-L. $LDFLAGS"> AC_SUBST(ARCHFILE)>This would break the previous fix so I did not even try to apply this ^

[#11003] miniruby loads extensions from already installed ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10303, was opened at 2007-04-23 10:44

10 messages 2007/04/23

[#11025] gsub with backslash characters in replacement string — "Adam Bozanich" <adam.boz@...>

Hello, spotted this one the other day:

10 messages 2007/04/26

Re: Bug in Net::HTTP#keep_alive?

From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2007-04-04 17:49:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #10863
Should I submit a bug for this?  I guess I'm not sure what proper
protocol is.....

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:44:49PM +0900, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> Sometimes Apache will send a connection header like this:
> 
>   Connection: Keep-Alive, close
> 
> then close the connection.  Net::HTTP#keep_alive? does not handle this
> response correctly.  It returns true when it should return false.
> Testing for closed state before keep-alive seems to do the trick.
> 
> Here is my patch (against 1.8.6):
> 
> Index: lib/net/http.rb
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/net/http.rb     (revision 12131)
> +++ lib/net/http.rb     (working copy)
> @@ -1089,10 +1089,10 @@
>      def keep_alive?(req, res)
>        return false if /close/i =~ req['connection'].to_s
>        return false if @seems_1_0_server
> +      return false if /close/i      =~ res['connection'].to_s
>        return true  if /keep-alive/i =~ res['connection'].to_s
> -      return false if /close/i      =~ res['connection'].to_s
> +      return false if /close/i      =~ res['proxy-connection'].to_s
>        return true  if /keep-alive/i =~ res['proxy-connection'].to_s
> -      return false if /close/i      =~ res['proxy-connection'].to_s
>        (@curr_http_version == '1.1')
>      end
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron Patterson
> http://tenderlovemaking.com/

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread